Looney Austin M, Doran James P, Johnson Emma E, Salvo John P
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Video J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 15;3(3):26350254231151965. doi: 10.1177/26350254231151965. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
The goal of hip labral reconstruction is to restore the suction seal, requiring the labral graft to be precisely secured along the acetabular rim. When performed arthroscopically, controlling the graft as it is suspended in the hip joint between 2 cannulas can be challenging, making fixation in the optimal position to restore the suction seal difficult to achieve.
Labral reconstruction/augmentation is indicated for patients with a deficient/dysfunctional labrum when repair alone cannot restore/maintain the suction seal.
Following diagnostic arthroscopy, debridement, and measurement of the labral deficiency (30 mm), 70 mm tibialis anterior allograft was tubularized with a whipstitch and prepared with long suture tails at both ends and a single mattress stitch placed through the graft at the medial end. Holes for the anchors were pre-drilled. Viewing from the anterolateral portal, the graft was introduced down a sled through the modified anterior portal, pulled through the joint, and guided into the posterolateral portal cannula via instrumentation through the distal anterolateral accessory portal. With initial fixation achieved medially with the mattress stitch, directing the graft into position while achieving optimal coverage of the deficient area was facilitated by the excess graft length pulled into the posterolateral portal cannula.
Labral reconstruction can restore the suction seal of the hip joint when repair alone is not sufficient. Comparative studies with matched repair cohorts have demonstrated comparable survivorship and patient-reported outcomes between groups, with similar rates of patient acceptable symptomatic state and minimal clinically important difference between groups, and similar rates of return to sport in high-level athletes. Recent systematic reviews have largely corroborated these findings.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic labral reconstruction is an effective treatment option when repair alone cannot restore the suction seal when the graft is secured in an optimal position, but controlling the graft during passage and fixation while achieving a final length spanning the segmental deficiency in continuity with native tissue at both ends can present technical challenges. The labral pull-through technique greatly facilitates this process.
The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.
髋关节盂唇重建的目标是恢复吸力密封,这要求盂唇移植物沿髋臼边缘精确固定。在关节镜下进行手术时,控制悬浮在髋关节中两个套管之间的移植物具有挑战性,因此难以将其固定在最佳位置以恢复吸力密封。
当单独修复无法恢复/维持吸力密封时,盂唇重建/增强适用于盂唇缺损/功能障碍的患者。
在进行诊断性关节镜检查、清创和测量盂唇缺损(30毫米)后,将70毫米的胫骨前肌同种异体移植物用锁边缝合法制成管状,并在两端制备长缝线尾,在内侧端通过移植物放置一个单褥式缝合。预先钻出用于锚钉的孔。从前外侧入口观察,将移植物通过改良的前入口沿滑板向下引入,拉过关节,并通过器械经远端前外侧辅助入口引导至后外侧入口套管。通过褥式缝合在内侧实现初始固定后,拉入后外侧入口套管的多余移植物长度有助于在实现缺损区域的最佳覆盖的同时将移植物引导至合适位置。
当单独修复不足时,盂唇重建可以恢复髋关节的吸力密封。与匹配的修复队列进行的比较研究表明,两组之间的生存率和患者报告的结果具有可比性,患者可接受症状状态的发生率相似,两组之间的最小临床重要差异相似,高水平运动员的恢复运动率也相似。最近的系统评价在很大程度上证实了这些发现。
讨论/结论:当单独修复无法恢复吸力密封时,关节镜下盂唇重建是一种有效的治疗选择,前提是移植物固定在最佳位置,但在移植物通过和固定过程中进行控制,同时实现跨越节段性缺损的最终长度并与两端的天然组织连续,这可能会带来技术挑战。盂唇牵拉技术极大地促进了这一过程。
作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果个体可能被识别,作者已随本提交的出版物附上患者的豁免声明或其他书面批准形式。