• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镥[177Lu]奥曲肽(Lutathera)的上市后安全性评估:FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒分析

Post-marketing Safety Evaluation of Lutathera ( 177 Lu-DOTATATE) : A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

作者信息

Chen Heng, Ma Junlong

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Hospital of Changsha (The Affiliated Changsha Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University).

Center of Clinical Pharmacology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 1;50(8):714-720. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005861. Epub 2025 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005861
PMID:40310018
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lutathera, a key therapy for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, has demonstrated efficacy, but its real-world safety profile remains unclear. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the adverse events (AEs) associated with Lutathera using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using FAERS data from Q4 2019 to Q3 2024. AE reports involving Lutathera were identified, and a case/non-case approach was employed to evaluate AE signals using disproportionality analysis methods, including the reporting odds ratio and information component (IC). Patient demographics, time to AE onset, and system organ class (SOC) involvement were analyzed.

RESULTS

After data processing, a total of 4284 AE reports associated with Lutathera were analyzed. The median time to AE onset was 113.5 days. Lutathera-related AEs exhibited a notably high mortality rate, reaching as much as 31.2%. Statistically significant signals were detected across 13 SOCs and multiple preferred terms (PTs). Among the SOCs, the most pronounced signals were observed in the category of endocrine disorders. The leading PTs included nonspecific disorders (IC 025 : 5.92), carcinoid syndrome (IC 025 : 5.69), and carcinoid crisis (IC 025 : 5.62). Moreover, several PTs not documented in the drug's labeling were reported, such as encephalitis, intestinal ischemia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study utilized real-world data to identify multiple risk signals associated with Lutathera, providing additional evidence to support its rational use. However, due to the inherent limitations of the FAERS database, further research is warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

Lutathera是胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤的一种关键治疗方法,已显示出疗效,但其实际的安全性概况仍不清楚。本研究旨在使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,对与Lutathera相关的不良事件(AE)进行全面分析。

患者和方法

使用2019年第四季度至2024年第三季度的FAERS数据进行回顾性药物警戒分析。识别涉及Lutathera的AE报告,并采用病例/非病例方法,使用不成比例分析方法(包括报告比值比和信息成分(IC))评估AE信号。分析了患者人口统计学、AE发生时间和系统器官分类(SOC)受累情况。

结果

数据处理后,共分析了4284份与Lutathera相关的AE报告。AE发生的中位时间为113.5天。与Lutathera相关的AE显示出显著高的死亡率,高达31.2%。在13个SOC和多个首选术语(PT)中检测到具有统计学意义的信号。在SOC中,在内分泌疾病类别中观察到最明显的信号。主要的PT包括非特异性疾病(IC 025:5.92)、类癌综合征(IC 025:5.69)和类癌危象(IC 025:5.62)。此外,还报告了该药物标签中未记录的几个PT,如脑炎、肠缺血和弥散性血管内凝血。

结论

我们的研究利用实际数据识别了与Lutathera相关的多个风险信号,为支持其合理使用提供了额外证据。然而,由于FAERS数据库的固有局限性,有必要进行进一步研究以验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Post-marketing Safety Evaluation of Lutathera ( 177 Lu-DOTATATE) : A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.镥[177Lu]奥曲肽(Lutathera)的上市后安全性评估:FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒分析
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 1;50(8):714-720. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005861. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
2
Postmarketing safety surveillance of 177 Lu-DOTA-TATE (LUTATHERA): an observational, pharmacovigilance study leveraging FAERS database.177Lu-DOTA-TATE(LUTATHERA)的上市后安全性监测:一项利用FAERS数据库的观察性药物警戒研究。
Nucl Med Commun. 2025 Oct 1;46(10):905-912. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000002015. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
Adverse events associated with gepants: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.与 gepants 相关的不良事件:基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的药物警戒分析
J Headache Pain. 2025 Jun 23;26(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-02091-3.
4
Adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a safety analysis of clinical trials and FDA pharmacovigilance system.免疫检查点抑制剂在非小细胞肺癌中的不良反应:临床试验和 FDA 药物警戒系统的安全性分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 30;15:1396752. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1396752. eCollection 2024.
5
Characteristics of Adverse Events and Clinical Risks of Omaveloxolone Based on FAERS Data.基于FAERS数据的奥马伐醌不良事件特征及临床风险
Cerebellum. 2025 Jun 18;24(4):119. doi: 10.1007/s12311-025-01873-4.
6
Unveiling Aducanumab's safety profile: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis.揭示阿杜卡奴单抗的安全性概况:一项全面的药物警戒分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 14;20(7):e0328076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328076. eCollection 2025.
7
Safety profile of ramelteon from the perspective of physicians and pharmacists: a 20-year real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.从医生和药剂师角度看雷美替胺的安全性:基于FAERS数据库的20年真实世界药物警戒分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07127-1.
8
Safety evaluation of irinotecan: a real-world disproportionality analysis using FAERS and JADER databases during the time period 2004-2024.伊立替康的安全性评估:2004年至2024年期间使用FAERS和JADER数据库进行的真实世界不成比例性分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1516449. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1516449. eCollection 2025.
9
Assessment of adverse events of the novel antiepileptic drug lamotrigine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS.新型抗癫痫药物拉莫三嗪不良事件的评估:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的真实世界药物警戒研究
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2025 Jul;24(7):805-814. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2465867. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
10
Real-world pharmacovigilance reports of hepatitis A inactivated and hepatitis B (recombinant) vaccine: insights from disproportionality analysis of the vaccine adverse event reporting system.甲型肝炎灭活疫苗和乙型肝炎(重组)疫苗的真实世界药物警戒报告:来自疫苗不良事件报告系统不成比例分析的见解
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 10;15:1609409. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1609409. eCollection 2025.