Suppr超能文献

当以片剂或胶囊形式给药时,对溴丙胺太林和消胆胺对地高辛生物利用度影响的稳态评估。

A steady-state evaluation of the effects of propantheline bromide and cholestyramine on the bioavailability of digoxin when administered as tablets or capsules.

作者信息

Brown D D, Schmid J, Long R A, Hull J H

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1985 Jul-Aug;25(5):360-4. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1985.tb02855.x.

Abstract

Drug interactions can profoundly alter the absorption of digoxin in tablet form. This study evaluated whether digoxin solution in capsules, a new dosage form with 90% to 100% bioavailability, would reduce such alterations, specifically those caused by cholestyramine and propantheline bromide. The investigation used a six-treatment, steady-state, balanced, incomplete block design with 18 healthy adults studied for four continuous two-week treatment periods. Treatments were either two 0.25 mg digoxin tablets or two 0.20 mg digoxin capsules administered alone, with propantheline, 15 mg qid, or with cholestyramine, 8 g qd. Bioavailability was determined from steady-state, 24-hour area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC, ng X h/mL) and from 0- and 24-hour trough serum digoxin concentrations (ng/mL). The AUCs for tablets alone, with cholestyramine, and with propantheline were 32.8 +/- 13.3 (+/- SD), 22.4 +/- 12.1, and 40.6 +/- 13.9, respectively, while corresponding values for capsules were 31.7 +/- 9.3, 24.7 +/- 7.9, and 35.9 +/- 12.8. The trough concentrations for tablets alone, with cholestyramine, and with propantheline were 0.88 +/- 0.47, 0.61 +/- 0.38, and 1.09 +/- 0.35, respectively; trough concentrations for capsules were 0.77 +/- 0.28, 0.74 +/- 0.28, and 0.96 +/- 0.48, respectively. The only significant differences in AUC were seen when comparing tablets alone versus tablets with cholestyramine (P less than .0005) and tablets with propantheline (P less than .01). A significant finding was also observed when comparing trough concentrations for tablets alone versus tablets with cholestyramine (P less than .005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

药物相互作用可显著改变片剂形式地高辛的吸收情况。本研究评估了胶囊形式的地高辛溶液(一种生物利用度为90%至100%的新剂型)是否会减少此类改变,特别是由考来烯胺和溴丙胺太林引起的改变。该研究采用了一种六治疗组、稳态、平衡、不完全区组设计,对18名健康成年人进行了四个连续两周的治疗期研究。治疗方法为单独服用两片0.25毫克地高辛片剂或两片0.20毫克地高辛胶囊,或与15毫克溴丙胺太林每日四次联用,或与8克考来烯胺每日一次联用。通过稳态下血清浓度-时间曲线下24小时面积(AUC,纳克·小时/毫升)以及0小时和24小时的谷值血清地高辛浓度(纳克/毫升)来确定生物利用度。单独服用片剂、与考来烯胺联用以及与溴丙胺太林联用的AUC分别为32.8±13.3(±标准差)、22.4±12.1和40.6±13.9,而胶囊的相应值分别为31.7±9.3、24.7±7.9和35.9±12.8。单独服用片剂、与考来烯胺联用以及与溴丙胺太林联用的谷值浓度分别为0.88±0.47、0.61±0.38和1.09±0.35;胶囊的谷值浓度分别为0.77±0.28、0.74±0.28和0.96±0.48。仅在比较单独服用片剂与与考来烯胺联用的片剂(P<0.0005)以及与溴丙胺太林联用的片剂(P<0.01)时,AUC出现了显著差异。在比较单独服用片剂与与考来烯胺联用的片剂的谷值浓度时,也观察到了一个显著发现(P<0.005)。(摘要截取自250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验