Garner Alan A, Scognamiglio Andrew, Lee Anna
Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Trauma Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Jun;37(3):e70052. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70052.
The Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM) enables paramedics and flight nurses to perform intubations interchangeably with team physicians in prehospital critical care. However, literature on ICOM characteristics and performance is limited.
We conducted a retrospective, observational study of an ICOM operating within an Australian Helicopter Emergency Medical Service over a nine-year period. First pass success, major complication rates and clinically important time intervals were compared between first intubator groups.
A total of 413 patients met the inclusion criteria, with paramedics performing the majority of first intubation attempts (379/413, 91.8%). Physicians primarily conducted second intubation attempts and managed high-risk patients. In unadjusted analysis, the risk of major complication in the paramedic/supervised registrar group was not lower than the most senior physician intubator group (relative risk [RR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.32; P = 0.198) and after adjustment the risk was also not lower (RR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.24-1.54; P = 0.289). First pass failure occurred in 12 (3.1%) and 1 (4.8%) patients intubated by paramedic/supervised registrar and most senior physician groups, respectively (P = 0.498). The median (95% CI) adjusted difference in contact to intubation time between paramedic/supervised registrar first intubator and most senior physician groups was -2 min (-7 to 3; P = 0.392). Total adjusted scene time was also not significantly different between groups (median difference 2 min, 95% CI: -3 to 7; P = 0.500).
Paramedics conducting most intubations within an ICOM are both safe and efficient. Larger studies are required to examine differences between physician subgroups.
可互换操作者模型(ICOM)使护理人员和空中护士能够在院前重症护理中与团队医生互换进行气管插管操作。然而,关于ICOM特征和性能的文献有限。
我们对澳大利亚直升机紧急医疗服务机构内运行9年的ICOM进行了一项回顾性观察研究。比较了首次插管组之间的首次通过成功率、主要并发症发生率和临床重要时间间隔。
共有413例患者符合纳入标准,其中护理人员进行了大多数首次插管尝试(379/413,91.8%)。医生主要进行第二次插管尝试并管理高危患者。在未调整分析中,护理人员/受监督住院医师组的主要并发症风险不低于最高级医生插管组(相对风险[RR]0.59,95%置信区间[CI]:0.26 - 1.32;P = 0.198),调整后风险也不低(RR 0.60,95% CI:0.24 - 1.54;P = 0.289)。护理人员/受监督住院医师组和最高级医生组分别有12例(3.1%)和1例(4.8%)患者首次插管失败(P = 0.498)。护理人员/受监督住院医师首次插管者与最高级医生组之间从接触到插管时间的中位数(95% CI)调整差异为 -2分钟(-7至3;P = 0.392)。两组之间的总调整现场时间也无显著差异(中位数差异2分钟,95% CI:-3至7;P = 0.500)。
在ICOM中进行大多数插管操作的护理人员既安全又高效。需要更大规模的研究来检查医生亚组之间的差异。