Suppr超能文献

院前急救麻醉中插管的成功:Inter-Changeable Operator Model(ICOM)的回顾性观察分析。

Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM).

机构信息

Department of Research, Audit, Innovation, and Development (RAID), East Anglian Air Ambulance, Helimed House, Hangar 14, Gambling Close, Norwich, UK.

Emergency Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 8;30(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01032-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) is a complex procedure with significant risks. First-pass intubation success (FPS) is recommended as a quality indicator in pre hospital advanced airway management. Previous data demonstrating significantly lower FPS by non-physicians does not distinguish between non-physicians operating in isolation or within physician teams. In several UK HEMS, the role of the intubating provider is interchangeable between the physician and critical care paramedic-termed the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM). The objectives of this study were to compare first-pass intubation success rate between physicians and critical care paramedics (CCP) in a large regional, multi-organisational dataset of trauma PHEA patients, and to report the application of the ICOM.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of consecutive trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA at two different ICOM Helicopter Emergency Medical Services in the East of England, 2015-2020. Data are presented as number (percentage) and median [inter-quartile range]. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions, reported as odds ratio (OR (95% confidence interval, 95% CI)), p value. The study design complied with the STROBE (Strengthening The Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

In the study period, 13,654 patients were attended. 674 (4.9%) trauma patients ≥ 16 years old who underwent PHEA were included in the final analysis: the median age was 44 [28-63] years old, and 502 (74.5%) were male. There was no significant difference in the FPS rate between physicians and CCPs-90.2% and 87.4% respectively, OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.7-2.5), p = 0.38. The cumulative first, second, third, and fourth-pass intubation success rates were 89.6%, 98.7%, 99.7%, and 100%. Patients who had a physician-operated initial intubation attempt weighed more and had a higher heart rate, compared to those who had a CCP-operated initial attempt.

CONCLUSION

In an ICOM setting, we demonstrated 100% intubation success in adult trauma patients undergoing PHEA. There was no significant difference in first-pass intubation success between physicians and CCPs.

摘要

背景

院前急救麻醉(PHEA)是一项具有显著风险的复杂程序。首次插管成功率(FPS)被推荐为院前高级气道管理的质量指标。先前的数据表明,非医师的 FPS 明显较低,但并没有区分非医师单独操作还是在医师团队中操作。在英国的几个 HEMS 中,医师和重症监护护理人员(CCP)之间的插管提供者角色是可互换的——称为可互换操作员模型(ICOM)。本研究的目的是在一个大型的、多组织的创伤性 PHEA 患者的区域数据集比较医师和重症监护护理人员(CCP)之间的首次插管成功率,并报告 ICOM 的应用。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年在英格兰东部的两个不同的 ICOM 直升机紧急医疗服务机构接受 PHEA 的年龄≥16 岁的连续创伤患者。数据以数字(百分比)和中位数[四分位数范围]表示。Fisher 确切检验用于比较比例,以比值比(OR(95%置信区间,95%CI))表示,p 值。该研究设计符合 STROBE(加强观察性研究的报告)报告指南。

结果

在研究期间,共收治了 13654 名患者。最终分析纳入了 13654 名患者中的 674 名(4.9%)年龄≥16 岁的创伤患者,他们接受了 PHEA:中位年龄为 44[28-63]岁,502 名(74.5%)为男性。医师和 CCP 之间的 FPS 率没有显著差异-分别为 90.2%和 87.4%,OR 1.3(95%CI 0.7-2.5),p=0.38。首次、第二次、第三次和第四次插管的累积成功率分别为 89.6%、98.7%、99.7%和 100%。与 CCP 操作的初始尝试相比,接受医师操作初始插管尝试的患者体重更重,心率更高。

结论

在 ICOM 环境下,我们在接受 PHEA 的成年创伤患者中证明了 100%的插管成功率。医师和 CCP 之间的首次插管成功率没有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99e6/9264686/b07728796457/13049_2022_1032_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验