• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术对肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者腹膜播散及预后的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究

Effects of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Prognosis in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Yoneyama Fumiya, Shinohara Masanao, Kawashima Yohei, Yoneyama Anna, Ishii Noritaka, Oishi Takuya, Tanaka Ryuma, Miura Hikari, Kodama Hirotake, Fujita Naoki, Okamoto Teppei, Yamamoto Hayato, Yoneyama Takahiro, Sato Satoshi, Ohyama Chikara, Hatakeyama Shingo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2025 Aug;32(8):1007-1013. doi: 10.1111/iju.70087. Epub 2025 May 1.

DOI:10.1111/iju.70087
PMID:40312917
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) on the incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis and prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in real-world practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 429 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, including RARC (n = 151) and ORC (n = 278), at Hirosaki University Hospital and Ageo Central General Hospital from 2011 to 2024. The incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis was compared between the RARC and ORC groups. Potential risk factors for peritoneal carcinomatosis were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis on overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis was low and not significantly different between the ORC (n = 13, 4.7%) and RARC (n = 6, 4.0%) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that clinical high-risk (cT3-4 or cN+) was significantly associated with an increased risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis (odds ratio: 5.03, 95% confidence interval 1.34-18.8, p = 0.016) after ORC but not RARC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Recurrence-free and overall survival were similar between RARC and ORC in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that pathological high-risk and peritoneal carcinomatosis but not RARC were significantly associated with poor overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the atypical recurrence pattern of peritoneal carcinomatosis were detected between RARC and ORC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may reduce the risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

摘要

目的

在实际临床实践中,我们比较了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)和开放性根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)对肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者腹膜种植转移发生率及预后的影响。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2024年在弘前大学医院和上尾中央综合医院接受根治性膀胱切除术的429例患者,其中包括接受RARC(n = 151)和ORC(n = 278)的患者。比较RARC组和ORC组腹膜种植转移的发生率。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定腹膜种植转移的潜在危险因素。使用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox回归分析评估腹膜种植转移对总生存的影响。

结果

ORC组(n = 13,4.7%)和RARC组(n = 6,4.0%)的腹膜种植转移发生率较低且无显著差异。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,临床高危(cT3-4或cN+)与ORC术后腹膜种植转移风险增加显著相关(比值比:5.03,95%置信区间1.34-18.8,p = 0.016),但与RARC术后无关。新辅助化疗显著降低了腹膜种植转移的风险。腹膜种植转移患者中,RARC和ORC的无复发生存率和总生存率相似。多变量Cox回归分析显示,病理高危和腹膜种植转移而非RARC与总生存较差显著相关。

结论

RARC和ORC在腹膜种植转移的非典型复发模式上未检测到显著差异。新辅助化疗可能降低腹膜种植转移的风险。

相似文献

1
Effects of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Prognosis in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术对肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者腹膜播散及预后的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究
Int J Urol. 2025 Aug;32(8):1007-1013. doi: 10.1111/iju.70087. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Safety of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Using the National Clinical Database in Japan.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的安全性:一项使用日本国家临床数据库的真实世界分析。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71109. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71109.
3
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
4
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较:使用随机对照试验的围手术期、肿瘤学和生活质量结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 9.
6
Robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Nov-Dec;50(6):683-702. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0191.
7
Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术的最佳实践:帕萨迪纳共识小组的建议。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
8
Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:住院不良结局比较
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1002/jso.28108.
9
Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Cystectomy Improve the Survival of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice?在真实世界临床实践中,新辅助化疗后行根治性膀胱切除术能否提高肌层浸润性膀胱癌的生存率?
Int J Urol. 2025 Jul;32(7):830-838. doi: 10.1111/iju.70064. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
10
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug 5;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03132-4.