Lincke Lena, Martin-Döring Tim, Daunke Andrea, Sadkowiak Antonia, Nolkemper Daria Alexandra, Sproeber-Kolb Nina, Bienioschek Stefanie, Reis Olaf, Kölch Michael
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Str. 20, Rostock, 18147, Germany.
Partner Site Greifswald/Rostock, German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ), Rostock, Germany.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 1;9:e58427. doi: 10.2196/58427.
Major depressive disorder is a common diagnosis among adolescents. Cognitive behavioral therapy is recommended as the first line of treatment. Digital health interventions, such as apps, could contribute to treatment. Advantages could be easy accessibility and availability, reduced time for face-to-face therapy, and the ability to intensify therapy by incorporating it into the patients' everyday lives. Challenges such as low adherence rates are common in digital health interventions. Therefore, they need to undergo rigorous testing for feasibility and effectiveness.
An evaluated, cognitive behavioral therapy-based face-to-face therapy program for depression in adolescents was transformed into an app called e-MICHI. This study examined its feasibility and efficacy for use in blended therapy in outpatient settings.
Adolescents aged 12 to 18 years with major depressive disorder receiving outpatient care were recruited from 2 university hospitals (n=36 included in analysis). The e-MICHI intervention combined daily app engagement over 6 weeks with 3 face-to-face sessions with a therapist. Feasibility was measured using various variables, including an adherence score (0=no or little patient engagement to 3=excellent engagement) and engagement rates (number of modules completed, number of messages sent by participants via the in-app messenger), satisfaction ratings from both participants and therapists, as well as participants' ratings of the usefulness of the antidepressant strategies covered in the app and the transfer of these strategies to everyday practice. Trends of efficacy were evaluated from multiple perspectives (participant self-rating, independent rater, or therapist), using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale. Feasibility metrics were assessed by analyzing their central tendency and dispersion, efficacy data were analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA.
e-MICHI was positively evaluated by both participants and therapists (participants: mean 7.3, SD 1.2 and therapists: mean 7.3, SD 1.1, on a scale from 0=bad to 10=excellent). Participants demonstrated high adherence rates (nearly 80%, n=25, received a "good" or "excellent" adherence score) and showed overall good engagement (app modules completed [maximum 6]: mean 5.03, SD 1.27 and messages sent via messenger: mean 23, SD 22.1). Participants rated the psychoeducational content of the app as particularly useful and reported consistent practice of the e-MICHI strategies in everyday life. Use of the app was associated with a significant reduction of depressive symptoms (before app use vs 3-month follow-up, Beck Depression Inventory-II: mean -6.76, SD 11.49, P=.01; Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised: mean -16.45, SD 16.76, P<.001; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale: mean -1.1, SD 1.24, P<.001).
While acknowledging its limitations, such as the small number of participants and the limited validity concerning efficacy, this study confirms the feasibility of e-MICHI for treating adolescent depression in outpatient settings.
重度抑郁症是青少年中常见的诊断结果。认知行为疗法被推荐为一线治疗方法。数字健康干预措施,如应用程序,可能有助于治疗。其优点包括易于获取和使用、减少面对面治疗的时间,以及通过将其融入患者日常生活来强化治疗的能力。低依从率等挑战在数字健康干预中很常见。因此,它们需要进行严格的可行性和有效性测试。
一个经过评估的、基于认知行为疗法的青少年抑郁症面对面治疗项目被转化为一个名为e-MICHI的应用程序。本研究考察了其在门诊混合治疗中的可行性和疗效。
从两家大学医院招募年龄在12至18岁、患有重度抑郁症且接受门诊治疗的青少年(分析中纳入36例)。e-MICHI干预措施包括在6周内每天使用应用程序,并与治疗师进行3次面对面治疗。使用各种变量来衡量可行性,包括依从性评分(0=无或很少有患者参与至3=参与度极佳)和参与率(完成的模块数量、参与者通过应用程序内信使发送的消息数量)、参与者和治疗师的满意度评分,以及参与者对应用程序中涵盖的抗抑郁策略的有用性及其在日常生活中的应用的评分。从多个角度(参与者自评、独立评估者或治疗师)使用贝克抑郁量表第二版、儿童抑郁评定量表修订版和临床总体印象-严重程度量表评估疗效趋势。通过分析可行性指标的集中趋势和离散程度进行评估,使用重复测量方差分析对疗效数据进行分析。
参与者和治疗师对e-MICHI的评价均为积极(参与者:平均7.3,标准差1.2;治疗师:平均7.3,标准差1.1,评分范围为0=差至10=极佳)。参与者表现出较高的依从率(近80%,n=25,获得“良好”或“极佳”的依从性评分),并且总体参与度良好(完成的应用程序模块[最多6个]:平均5.03,标准差1.27;通过信使发送的消息:平均23,标准差22.1)。参与者认为应用程序的心理教育内容特别有用,并报告在日常生活中持续实践e-MICHI策略。使用该应用程序与抑郁症状的显著减轻相关(应用程序使用前与3个月随访后相比,贝克抑郁量表第二版:平均-6.76,标准差11.49,P=.01;儿童抑郁评定量表修订版:平均-16.45,标准差16.76,P<.001;临床总体印象-严重程度量表:平均-1.1,标准差1.24,P<.001)。
尽管承认其局限性,如参与者数量少和疗效有效性有限,但本研究证实了e-MICHI在门诊治疗青少年抑郁症的可行性。