Caven Peter J, Zhang Zitao, Abbott Jacob, Ma Xinyao, Camp L Jean
Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024:827. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642951. Epub 2024 May 11.
There are currently multiple proposed security label designs for consumer products, with each prioritizing different security and privacy factors. These differences risk making product comparisons more confusing than informative. Standardized labels could potentially resolve this by informing consumers of a product's security features at the point of purchase. But which standard? This survey, of 500 participants, studied four label designs and measured comprehension, response time, acceptability, and cognitive load. We gauged understanding of participant perception and preferences using three smart devices: light bulbs, cameras, and thermostats. We identified preferences and behaviors before, during, and after label use for product selection. At first, participants believed more information-dense labels would better support their purchasing behavior; however, after they evaluated and compared products, participants gravitated towards less cognitively demanding designs. We identified how participants utilized and prioritized label elements to provide recommendations for US label design efforts.
目前有多种针对消费品的安全标签设计方案,每种方案都侧重于不同的安全和隐私因素。这些差异可能会使产品比较变得更令人困惑,而不是更具信息量。标准化标签有可能通过在购买时向消费者告知产品的安全特性来解决这一问题。但采用哪种标准呢?这项针对500名参与者的调查研究了四种标签设计,并测量了理解程度、反应时间、可接受性和认知负荷。我们使用三种智能设备——灯泡、摄像头和恒温器,来评估参与者的感知和偏好理解情况。我们在标签用于产品选择之前、期间和之后,确定了参与者的偏好和行为。起初,参与者认为信息更密集的标签会更好地支持他们的购买行为;然而,在他们评估和比较产品之后,参与者倾向于认知要求较低的设计。我们确定了参与者如何利用标签元素并对其进行优先级排序,以便为美国的标签设计工作提供建议。