Yadav Manuj, Kim Jungsoo, Hongisto Valtteri, Cabrera Densil, de Dear Richard
School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.
Institute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Kopernikusstrasse 5, Aachen 52074, Germany.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 May 1;157(5):3378-3389. doi: 10.1121/10.0036594.
Open-plan offices are well-known to be adversely affected by acoustic issues. This study aims to model acoustic dissatisfaction using measurements of room acoustics and sound environment during occupancy, and occupant surveys (n = 349) in 28 offices representing a diverse range of workplace parameters. As latent factors, the contribution of lack of privacy (LackPriv) was 25% higher than noise disturbance in predicting acoustic dissatisfaction (AcDsat). Room acoustic metrics based on sound pressure level (SPL) decay of speech (Lp,A,s,4m and rC) were better in predicting these factors than distraction distance (rD) based on speech transmission index. This contradicts previous findings, which may partly be due to the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, the trends for SPL-based metrics in predicting AcDsat and LackPriv go against expectations based on ISO 3382-3. For sound during occupation, LA,90 and psychoacoustic loudness (N90) predicted AcDsat, and a SPL fluctuation metric (MA,eq) predicted LackPriv. However, these metrics were weaker predictors than ISO 3382-3 metrics. Medium-sized offices exhibited higher dissatisfaction than larger (≥50 occupants) offices. Dissatisfaction varied substantially across parameters including ceiling heights, number of workstations, and years of work, but not between offices with fixed seating compared to more flexible and activity-based working configurations.