Miller Renee, Battle Mark, Wangerin Kristen, Huff Daniel T, Weisman Amy J, Chen Song, Perk Timothy G, Ulaner Gary A
GE HealthCare, Pollards Wood, Nightingales Lane, Chalfont Saint Giles HP8 4SP, United Kingdom.
AIQ Solutions, Madison, Wis.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 May;7(3):e240253. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240253.
Purpose To evaluate two automated tools for detecting lesions on fluorine 18 (F) fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT images and assess concordance of F-FES PET/CT with standard diagnostic CT and/or F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospective study included participants with breast cancer who underwent F-FES PET/CT examinations ( = 52), F-FDG PET/CT examinations ( = 13 of 52), and diagnostic CT examinations ( = 37 of 52). A convolutional neural network was trained for lesion detection using manually contoured lesions. Concordance in lesions labeled by a nuclear medicine physician between F-FES and F-FDG PET/CT and between F-FES PET/CT and diagnostic CT was assessed using an automated software medical device. Lesion detection performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positives per participant. Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results The study included 52 participants. The lesion detection algorithm achieved a median sensitivity of 62% with 0 false positives per participant. Compared with sensitivity in overall lesion detection, the sensitivity was higher for detection of high-uptake lesions (maximum standardized uptake value > 1.5, = .002) and similar for detection of large lesions (volume > 0.5 cm, = .15). The artificial intelligence (AI) lesion detection tool was combined with a standardized uptake value threshold to demonstrate a fully automated method of labeling patients as having FES-avid metastases. Additionally, automated concordance analysis showed that 17 of 25 participants (68%) had over half of the detected lesions across two modalities present on F-FES PET/CT images. Conclusion An AI model was trained to detect lesions on F-FES PET/CT images and an automated concordance tool measured heterogeneity between F-FES PET/CT and standard-of-care imaging. Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Neural Networks, PET/CT, Breast, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Segmentation, F-FES PET, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Lesion Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Lesion Matching Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04883814 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
目的 评估两种用于检测氟-18(F)氟雌二醇(FES)PET/CT图像上病变的自动化工具,并评估F-FES PET/CT与标准诊断CT和/或F氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT在乳腺癌患者中的一致性。材料与方法 这项对一项前瞻性研究的回顾性分析纳入了接受F-FES PET/CT检查的乳腺癌患者(n = 52)、F-FDG PET/CT检查的患者(52例中的13例)以及诊断性CT检查的患者(52例中的37例)。使用手动勾勒的病变训练卷积神经网络用于病变检测。使用自动化软件医疗设备评估核医学医师标记的F-FES与F-FDG PET/CT之间以及F-FES PET/CT与诊断性CT之间病变的一致性。使用每位参与者的敏感性和假阳性评估病变检测性能。采用Wilcoxon检验进行统计学比较。结果 该研究纳入了52例参与者。病变检测算法的中位敏感性为62%,每位参与者的假阳性为0。与总体病变检测的敏感性相比,高摄取病变(最大标准化摄取值>1.5,P = .002)检测的敏感性更高,大病变(体积>0.5 cm,P = .15)检测的敏感性相似。人工智能(AI)病变检测工具与标准化摄取值阈值相结合,展示了一种将患者标记为具有FES摄取性转移灶的全自动方法。此外,自动化一致性分析显示,25例参与者中有17例(68%)在F-FES PET/CT图像上两种模式检测到的病变中有超过一半存在。结论 训练了一种AI模型用于检测F-FES PET/CT图像上的病变,并且一种自动化一致性工具测量了F-FES PET/CT与标准治疗成像之间的异质性。分子成像 - 癌症、神经网络.PET/CT、乳腺、计算机应用 - 一般(信息学)、分割、F-FES PET、转移性乳腺癌、病变检测、人工智能、病变匹配 临床试验标识符:NCT04883814 根据知识共享署名4.0许可发布。