Kassymova Gulnara, Davidson Thomas, Sydsjö Gunilla, Wodlin Ninnie Borendal, Nilsson Lena, Kjølhede Preben
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 58245, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08035-1.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the health economics of nurse-led telephone follow-up contacts (TFUs) within six weeks after benign hysterectomy in a societal perspective, using a cost minimization analysis model.
A randomized, single-blinded, controlled, Swedish multicenter study comprising 487 women undergoing benign hysterectomy. The women were allocated 1:1:1:1 to either Group A (no TFUs), Group B (one clinically structured TFU the day after discharge), Group C (as B, but with additional TFUs once weekly for six weeks, in total six TFUs), or Group D (as C, but by applying a coaching technique). Time consumption for planned TFUs, informal care, and the number of unplanned telephone contacts and visits were recorded. Costs were assessed using a cost-per-patient price list for Linköping University Hospital.
The total cost per patient more than doubled in the groups with repeated TFUs (Groups C and D) compared with no TFUs (Group A). Group D demonstrated fewer unplanned telephone contacts and lower informal care costs. Group B, with only one TFU, exhibited the highest time consumption for TFU. The additional costs of six TFUs, with or without coaching, substantially increased the costs. The coaching TFU group (Group D) had the lowest cost for informal care.
TFUs appeared to be costly and an inefficient way of using healthcare resources after benign hysterectomy. The coaching TFU seemed to reduce unplanned telephone contacts and lower informal care costs. Careful consideration of the costs and the impact on clinical outcomes is important before implementing TFU after surgery.
This study is registered retrospectively in ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01526668 on January 27, 2012. Date of enrollment of first patient: October 11; 2011.
本研究旨在从社会角度,使用成本最小化分析模型,评估良性子宫切除术后六周内由护士主导的电话随访(TFU)的健康经济学情况。
一项随机、单盲、对照的瑞典多中心研究,纳入487例行良性子宫切除术的女性。这些女性按1:1:1:1随机分配至A组(无电话随访)、B组(出院次日进行一次结构化临床电话随访)、C组(同B组,但术后六周每周额外进行一次电话随访,共六次电话随访)或D组(同C组,但采用指导技术)。记录计划电话随访的时间消耗、非正式护理情况以及非计划电话联系和就诊的次数。使用林雪平大学医院的每位患者费用清单评估成本。
与无电话随访的A组相比,进行重复电话随访的组(C组和D组)每位患者的总成本增加了一倍多。D组的非计划电话联系较少,非正式护理成本较低。仅进行一次电话随访的B组,电话随访的时间消耗最高。六次电话随访的额外成本,无论有无指导,都大幅增加了费用。采用指导技术的电话随访组(D组)的非正式护理成本最低。
电话随访在良性子宫切除术后似乎成本高昂且是一种低效的医疗资源使用方式。采用指导技术的电话随访似乎减少了非计划电话联系并降低了非正式护理成本。在术后实施电话随访之前,仔细考虑成本以及对临床结局的影响很重要。
本研究于2012年1月27日在ClinicalTrial.gov上进行回顾性注册:NCT01526668。首例患者入组日期:2011年10月11日。