Kook Incheol, Kim Keong Yoon, Hwang Kyu Tae
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 04763, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 2;15(1):15454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99271-7.
In dual-plate fixation of distal femoral fractures (DFF), reducing the relatively spared medial side first and using this metaphyseal-medial condylar segment as a template to reduce the lateral side may effectively facilitate reduction. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the medial-first dual-plate fixation in DFF. A retrospective study was conducted on 77 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for DFF at a single institution between April 2012 and 2021. The patients were divided into a group in which medial-side ORIF was first performed followed by a lateral-ORIF (group M) and a lateral-ORIF only performed (group L). The demographic data, fracture classification, clinical outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, patient satisfaction, and pain level, and radiographic outcomes of the two groups were compared. There was no difference in the demographics or fracture classification between group M (n = 27) and group L (n = 50). The operative time was similar in the two groups. Group M had a significantly smaller articular gap, better union rate, shorter time to union, and stronger maintenance of coronal and sagittal alignment (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, complications, reoperation rate, patient satisfaction, or pain level between the two groups. Medial-first dual-plate fixation showed better radiographic and comparable clinical results compared to lateral single-plate fixation in treating DFF. Medial-first dual-plate fixation facilitates the reduction and is believed to increase the reduction quality.
在股骨远端骨折(DFF)的双钢板固定中,先复位相对完整的内侧,然后以该干骺端内侧髁段为模板复位外侧,可能有效地促进骨折复位。本研究评估了内侧优先双钢板固定治疗DFF的有效性。对2012年4月至2021年期间在单一机构接受切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗DFF的77例患者进行了回顾性研究。将患者分为先进行内侧ORIF然后进行外侧ORIF的组(M组)和仅进行外侧ORIF的组(L组)。比较两组的人口统计学数据、骨折分类、临床结果(包括手术时间、估计失血量、并发症、患者满意度和疼痛程度)以及影像学结果。M组(n = 27)和L组(n = 50)在人口统计学或骨折分类方面没有差异。两组的手术时间相似。M组的关节间隙明显更小,愈合率更高,愈合时间更短,冠状面和矢状面的对线维持更好(P < 0.05)。两组在估计失血量﹑并发症、再次手术率、患者满意度或疼痛程度方面没有显著差异。与外侧单钢板固定相比,内侧优先双钢板固定在治疗DFF时显示出更好的影像学结果和相当的临床效果。内侧优先双钢板固定有助于骨折复位,并且被认为可以提高复位质量。