Zhang Le, Wang Xia, Ming Pu, Ma Li-Na, Ma Wanlong, Ding Xiang-Chun
Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Department of Infectious Disease, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, Ningxia, China.
Thromb J. 2025 May 2;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00725-9.
To evaluate the risk factors of liver cirrhosis complicated with portal vein thrombosis and the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy.
Relevant literature was searched through PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Medical Network and CNKI databases, and eligible literature was included. QUADS scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literatures, and Stata15.1 software was used for meta-analysis and statistical processing.
For risk factors analysis for cirrhosis with Portal vein thrombosis, 19 literatures were included, including 1563 patients with cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis and 2579 patients with cirrhosis without portal vein thrombosis, all of which were not treated with anticoagulation. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the PVT group, there was no significant difference in creatinine(Scr,MD = 0.09,95%CI: -0.03-0.22,P = 0.132)and total bilirubin(TBIL,MD = -0.00, 95%CI: -0.10 ~ 0.09,P = 0.948).There was significant difference in albumin(ALB,MD = -0.32, 95%CI:-0.43-0.21,P = 0.000)and PLT(PLT, MD = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.26, P = 0.004).And there was also no difference in hypertension history (OR = 0.78,95%CI:0.59 ~ 1.03,P = 0.079). In the study on the anticoagulant effect and safety of liver cirrhosis complicated with portal vein thrombosis, a total of 9 literatures were included. Among them,497 patients with liver cirrhosis complicated by portal vein thrombosis are treated with Anticoagulation treatment, and 633 patients with cirrhosis complicated by portal vein thrombosis without anticoagulation treatment. The analysis results showed that the thrombus recanalization situation of liver cirrhosis complicated with portal vein thrombosis after anticoagulation treatment was better than that of patients without anticoagulation (OR = 4.052,95%CI: 2.737-6.000,P = 0.000),and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding events between patients with anticoagulation and those without anticoagulation (OR = 1.017, 95%CI:0.735-1.407,P = 0.920). The Stata15.1Egger test showed no significant publication bias for all the results(P > 0.05).
Patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with low platelet and low albumin are more likely to develop PVT. Anticoagulation is helpful and safe for thrombolysis in patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with PVT.
评估肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成的危险因素以及抗凝治疗的疗效和安全性。
通过PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science、万方医学网和CNKI数据库检索相关文献,并纳入符合条件的文献。采用QUADS量表评估纳入文献的质量,使用Stata15.1软件进行荟萃分析和统计处理。
对于肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析,纳入19篇文献,其中包括1563例肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成患者和2579例无门静脉血栓形成的肝硬化患者,所有患者均未接受抗凝治疗。荟萃分析结果显示,与门静脉血栓形成组相比,肌酐(Scr,MD = 0.09,95%CI:-0.03 - 0.22,P = 0.132)和总胆红素(TBIL,MD = -0.00,95%CI:-0.10 ~ 0.09,P = 0.948)无显著差异。白蛋白(ALB,MD = -0.32,95%CI:-0.43 - 0.21,P = 0.000)和血小板(PLT,MD = 0.15,95%CI:0.05 - 0.26,P = 0.004)有显著差异。高血压病史也无差异(OR = 0.78,95%CI:0.59 ~ 1.03,P = 0.079)。在肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成的抗凝效果和安全性研究中,共纳入9篇文献。其中,497例肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成患者接受抗凝治疗,633例肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成患者未接受抗凝治疗。分析结果显示,肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成患者抗凝治疗后的血栓再通情况优于未接受抗凝治疗的患者(OR = 4.052,95%CI:2.737 - 6.000,P = 0.000),抗凝治疗患者与未抗凝治疗患者出血事件的发生率无显著差异(OR = 1.017,95%CI:0.735 - 1.407,P = 0.920)。Stata15.1Egger检验显示所有结果均无显著发表偏倚(P > 0.05)。
肝硬化合并血小板减少和白蛋白降低的患者更易发生门静脉血栓形成。抗凝治疗对肝硬化合并门静脉血栓形成患者的溶栓治疗有帮助且安全。