Jung Jae Wook, Kim Kwang Hyun, Yun Jaeseob, Joo Haram, Kim Young Dae, Heo JoonNyung, Lee Hyungwoo, Kim Byung Moon, Kim Dong Joon, Shin Na Young, Cho Bang-Hoon, Ahn Seong Hwan, Park Hyungjong, Sohn Sung-Il, Hong Jeong-Ho, Song Tae-Jin, Chang Yoonkyung, Kim Gyu Sik, Seo Kwon-Duk, Lee Kijeong, Chang Jun Young, Seo Jung Hwa, Lee Sukyoon, Baek Jang-Hyun, Cho Han-Jin, Shin Dong Hoon, Kim Jinkwon, Yoo Joonsang, Baik Minyoul, Jung Yo Han, Hwang Yang-Ha, Kim Chi Kyung, Kim Jae Guk, Lee Il Hyung, Choi Jin Kyo, Lee Chan Joo, Park Sungha, Jeon Soyoung, Lee Hye Sun, Kwon Sun U, Bang Oh Young, Heo Ji Hoe, Nam Hyo Suk
Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Neurology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Eur Stroke J. 2025 May 2:23969873251335204. doi: 10.1177/23969873251335204.
While the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in large core infarcts has been established, the influence of blood pressure (BP) management on functional outcomes based on infarct volume remains unclear.
We conducted a secondary analysis of the Outcome in Patients Treated With Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy-Optimal Blood Pressure Control (OPTIMAL-BP) trial, which compared intensive (systolic BP < 140 mmHg) versus conventional (systolic BP 140-180 mmHg) BP management within the first 24 h following successful recanalization. Patients were grouped based on an infarct volume cut-off of 50 ml, assessed 24 h post-EVT. The primary efficacy outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale of 0-2) at 3 months. Change of predicted probability for functional independence between BP managements, as infarct volume varied, was assessed.
Of the 300 patients, 222 (74.0%) were in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group and 78 (26.0%) were in the infarct volume >50 ml group. The conventional management was significantly associated with a higher rate of functional independence in the infarct volume ⩽50 ml group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.06 [95% CI, 1.12-3.86]). In the infarct volume >50 ml group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between BP managements (AOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 0.46-5.04]). The interaction effect between the infarct volume groups and BP managements was not significant. As infarct volume increased, the difference in predicted probability of functional independence between BP managements decreased.
Conventional BP management showed greater benefits for achieving functional independence at 3 months when infarct volumes were smaller. As infarct volume increased, the impact of BP management strategies on functional outcomes decreased.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04205305).
虽然血管内血栓切除术(EVT)在大面积核心梗死中的疗效已得到证实,但基于梗死体积的血压(BP)管理对功能结局的影响仍不清楚。
我们对动脉内血栓切除术-最佳血压控制(OPTIMAL-BP)试验进行了二次分析,该试验比较了成功再通后24小时内强化(收缩压<140mmHg)与常规(收缩压140-180mmHg)血压管理。根据梗死体积临界值50ml对患者进行分组,在血管内血栓切除术后24小时进行评估。主要疗效结局是3个月时的功能独立性(改良Rankin量表评分为0-2)。评估了随着梗死体积变化,不同血压管理方式下功能独立性预测概率的变化。
在300例患者中,222例(74.0%)在梗死体积≤50ml组,78例(26.0%)在梗死体积>50ml组。在梗死体积≤50ml组,常规管理与更高的功能独立性发生率显著相关(调整优势比[AOR],2.06[95%CI,1.12-3.86])。在梗死体积>50ml组,不同血压管理方式下功能独立患者的比例无显著差异(AOR,1.52[95%CI,0.46-5.04])。梗死体积组与血压管理之间的交互作用不显著。随着梗死体积增加,不同血压管理方式下功能独立性预测概率的差异减小。
当梗死体积较小时,常规血压管理在3个月时实现功能独立性方面显示出更大益处。随着梗死体积增加,血压管理策略对功能结局的影响减小。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04205305)。