• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对年轻成年女性癌症幸存者的癌症后生育决策辅助与规划工具的感知影响。

Perceived impact of a decision-aid and planning tool for family building after cancer for young adult female cancer survivors.

作者信息

Jagielo Annemarie D, Shanley Jacqueline, Diefenbach Michael A, Ford Jennifer S, Schapira Lidia, Benedict Catherine

机构信息

PGSP-Stanford Psy.D. Consortium, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 3;33(5):444. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09478-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09478-7
PMID:40317326
Abstract

PURPOSE

Young adult female (YA-F) cancer survivors report fertility-related uncertainty and distress. Roadmap to Parenthood ("Roadmap") is a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer. This study examined the perceived impact of Roadmap, encompassing aspects of website utility and its effects on confidence and motivation, identified factors related to the perceived impact of Roadmap, and evaluated whether the perceived impact related to changes in psychosocial outcomes.

METHODS

Secondary analyses of a single-arm pilot study were conducted. Participants completed a baseline survey (T1), accessed Roadmap, and completed a survey 1 month post-baseline (T2). The eHealth Impact Questionnaire (eHIQ) measured the perceived impact of Roadmap. A linear regression model evaluated associations between baseline factors and the eHIQ. Linear regression models evaluated relationships between the eHIQ and decisional conflict, unmet information needs, fertility self-efficacy, and self-efficacy for managing fertility-related negative emotions at T2, controlling for baseline (T1) levels of each outcome.

RESULTS

Among participants (N = 98), 93% reported accessing Roadmap. A more positive perceived impact of Roadmap was related to younger age (β =  - .348 p = .002), lower household income (β =  - .321. p = .021), greater health literacy (β = .326 p = .004), and dissatisfaction with post-treatment fertility discussions (β =  - .279 p = .029). Those who reported a more positive perceived impact of Roadmap reported lower decisional conflict (β =  - .368, p < .001) and unmet information needs (β =  - .515, p < .001); self-efficacy outcomes were not related.

CONCLUSION

A web-based decision aid for family building after cancer effectively supports important survivor subgroups. Future directions include assessing the needs of those with low health literacy and improving patient-provider communication.

摘要

目的

年轻成年女性(YA - F)癌症幸存者报告了与生育相关的不确定性和困扰。“为人父母路线图”(“路线图”)是一种基于网络的决策辅助工具和癌症后家庭生育规划工具。本研究考察了路线图的感知影响,包括网站效用的各个方面及其对信心和动机的影响,确定了与路线图感知影响相关的因素,并评估了感知影响是否与心理社会结果的变化有关。

方法

对一项单臂试点研究进行二次分析。参与者完成基线调查(T1),访问路线图,并在基线后1个月完成调查(T2)。电子健康影响问卷(eHIQ)测量路线图的感知影响。线性回归模型评估基线因素与eHIQ之间的关联。线性回归模型评估T2时eHIQ与决策冲突、未满足的信息需求、生育自我效能以及管理与生育相关负面情绪的自我效能之间的关系,并控制每个结果的基线(T1)水平。

结果

在参与者(N = 98)中,93%报告访问了路线图。路线图更积极的感知影响与年龄较小(β = -0.348,p = 0.002)、家庭收入较低(β = -0.321,p = 0.021)、健康素养较高(β = 0.326,p = 0.004)以及对治疗后生育讨论不满意(β = -0.279,p = 0.029)有关。那些报告路线图有更积极感知影响的人报告的决策冲突较低(β = -0.368,p < 0.001)和未满足的信息需求较低(β = -0.515,p < 0.001);自我效能结果无关。

结论

一种基于网络的癌症后家庭生育决策辅助工具有效地支持了重要的幸存者亚组。未来的方向包括评估健康素养低的人群的需求以及改善医患沟通。

相似文献

1
Perceived impact of a decision-aid and planning tool for family building after cancer for young adult female cancer survivors.针对年轻成年女性癌症幸存者的癌症后生育决策辅助与规划工具的感知影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 3;33(5):444. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09478-7.
2
Preliminary testing of "roadmap to parenthood" decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer: Results of a single-arm pilot study.癌症后生育“路线图”决策辅助工具和家庭生育计划的初步测试:单臂试点研究结果。
Psychooncology. 2024 Apr;33(4):e6323. doi: 10.1002/pon.6323.
3
Family-building decision aid and planning tool for young adult women after cancer treatment: protocol for preliminary testing of a web-based decision support intervention in a single-arm pilot study.癌症治疗后年轻成年女性的生育决策辅助与规划工具:一项单臂试点研究中基于网络的决策支持干预初步测试方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 29;9(12):e033630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033630.
4
Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing.用于癌症后生育规划的基于网络的决策辅助与规划工具(为人父母路线图)的开发:可用性测试
JMIR Cancer. 2022 May 31;8(2):e33304. doi: 10.2196/33304.
5
Greater fertility distress and avoidance relate to poorer decision making about family building after cancer among adolescent and young adult female survivors.生育困境和回避感越大,青少年和年轻成年女性癌症幸存者在决定生育问题时的决策质量就越差。
Psychooncology. 2023 Oct;32(10):1606-1615. doi: 10.1002/pon.6212. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
"Looking at future cancer survivors, give them a roadmap": addressing fertility and family-building topics in post-treatment cancer survivorship care.“为未来的癌症幸存者指明道路”:在癌症治疗后生存护理中解决生育和家庭建设问题。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):2203-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05731-3. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Young adult female cancer survivors' unmet information needs and reproductive concerns contribute to decisional conflict regarding posttreatment fertility preservation.年轻成年女性癌症幸存者未满足的信息需求和生殖方面的担忧导致了她们在治疗后生育力保存决策上的冲突。
Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2101-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29917. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Toward a theoretical understanding of young female cancer survivors' decision-making about family-building post-treatment.旨在对年轻女性癌症幸存者治疗后关于家庭生育决策的理论理解。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4857-4867. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05307-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Fertility information needs and concerns post-treatment contribute to lowered quality of life among young adult female cancer survivors.治疗后对生育能力的信息需求和担忧会降低年轻成年女性癌症幸存者的生活质量。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2209-2215. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-4006-z. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.随机对照试验研究在线决策辅助工具对年轻女性癌症患者生育力保存的效果。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1726-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez136.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Reproductive Technology Use and Family-Building Experiences of Female Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.成年女性儿童癌症幸存者的辅助生殖技术使用情况及组建家庭经历:一项定性研究
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 25;32(7):369. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070369.

本文引用的文献

1
Availability of Adolescent and Young Adult-Specific Sexual and Reproductive Health Programs and Resources: A Review of the Websites of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers.青少年及青年特异性性与生殖健康项目及资源的可及性:对美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心网站的综述
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2025 Jun;14(3):283-289. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0118. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Cancer and Fertility: Exploring Uncertainty Management Strategies of Young Adult Female Survivors.癌症与生育:探索年轻成年女性幸存者的不确定性管理策略
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2024 Dec;13(6):882-887. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0015. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Preliminary testing of "roadmap to parenthood" decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer: Results of a single-arm pilot study.
癌症后生育“路线图”决策辅助工具和家庭生育计划的初步测试:单臂试点研究结果。
Psychooncology. 2024 Apr;33(4):e6323. doi: 10.1002/pon.6323.
4
Interventions to improve oncofertility knowledge and decision-making in patients with low health literacy: A systematic review.提高低健康素养肿瘤患者生育力知识和决策的干预措施:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Feb;119:108096. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108096. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
5
Greater fertility distress and avoidance relate to poorer decision making about family building after cancer among adolescent and young adult female survivors.生育困境和回避感越大,青少年和年轻成年女性癌症幸存者在决定生育问题时的决策质量就越差。
Psychooncology. 2023 Oct;32(10):1606-1615. doi: 10.1002/pon.6212. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing.用于癌症后生育规划的基于网络的决策辅助与规划工具(为人父母路线图)的开发:可用性测试
JMIR Cancer. 2022 May 31;8(2):e33304. doi: 10.2196/33304.
7
Digital Technologies for Emotion-Regulation Assessment and Intervention: A Conceptual Review.用于情绪调节评估与干预的数字技术:概念性综述
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Jan;10(1):3-26. doi: 10.1177/21677026211011982. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Evolution and growth of the ECHO (Enriching Communication skills for Health professionals in Oncofertility) program: a 5-year study in the training of oncofertility professionals.ECHO(提高肿瘤生育力专业人员沟通技巧)项目的发展与成长:一项针对肿瘤生育力专业人员培训的 5 年研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Aug;17(4):1184-1190. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01139-y. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Trainee-Led Quality Improvement Project to Improve Fertility Preservation Counseling for Patients With Cancer.学员主导的质量改进项目,以改善癌症患者的生育力保存咨询。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Mar;18(3):e403-e411. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00479. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS).社会弱势群体患者决策辅助工具的系统评价和荟萃分析:国际患者决策辅助标准(IPDAS)更新。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Oct;41(7):870-896. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211020317. Epub 2021 Jun 21.