Todhunter-Brown Alex
Department of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2025 May;56(3):418-420. doi: 10.1177/10538135251323968. Epub 2025 May 3.
BackgroundPatients who have had a stroke are at risk of contractures, a shortening of muscles and other soft tissues. Muscle stretching, manually or delivered by other means, is a common strategy to manage contractures following stroke. A Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. has investigated the effectiveness of assistive technology defined as a mechanical, electrical, or electromechanical device used to stretch or lengthen a muscle statically, dynamically, or cyclically for preventing or reducing contractures.ObjectiveTo summarize the Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. and comment on it from a rehabilitation perspective.MethodsThe Cochrane Review authors identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) which investigated the use of electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke. RCTs had to compare these assistive technologies with no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology. Passive range of motion (PROM) was the primary outcome.ResultsSeven studies (294 participants) were included. Data from five studies (252 participants) comparing assistive technologies with routine care were meta-analyzed. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of assistive technology on PROM, adverse events and other outcomes.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support clinical decisions about the effectiveness of assistive technology in the management of contractures in people with stroke. Rehabilitation professionals should select strategies for management of contractures in patients with stroke based on an expert assessment of a patient's individual needs and preferences, and ensure regular re-assessment. High quality research is necessary in this field.
背景
中风患者有发生挛缩的风险,即肌肉和其他软组织的缩短。手动或通过其他方式进行肌肉拉伸是中风后处理挛缩的常见策略。穆罕默德·梅兰等人进行的一项考克兰系统评价研究了辅助技术的有效性,辅助技术被定义为用于静态、动态或周期性地拉伸或延长肌肉以预防或减少挛缩的机械、电气或机电设备。
目的
总结穆罕默德·梅兰等人的考克兰系统评价,并从康复角度对其进行评论。
方法
考克兰系统评价的作者检索了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验研究了使用电气、机械或机电设备来处理成年中风患者的挛缩情况。RCT必须将这些辅助技术与不治疗、常规治疗或另一种辅助技术进行比较。被动关节活动度(PROM)是主要结局指标。
结果
纳入了7项研究(294名参与者)。对5项研究(252名参与者)中辅助技术与常规护理进行比较的数据进行了荟萃分析。关于辅助技术对PROM、不良事件和其他结局的影响,证据非常不确定。
结论
没有足够的证据支持关于辅助技术在中风患者挛缩管理中有效性的临床决策。康复专业人员应根据对患者个体需求和偏好的专业评估,为中风患者选择挛缩管理策略,并确保定期重新评估。该领域需要高质量的研究。