Swank Chad, Gillespie Jaime, Arnold Dannae, Wynne Lindsey, Bennett Monica, Meza Faith, Ochoa Christa, Callender Librada, Sikka Seema, Driver Simon
Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas; Baylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, Texas.
Baylor Scott and White Institute for Rehabilitation, Dallas, Texas.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Sep;106(9):1320-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.015. Epub 2025 May 2.
To examine the efficacy of a stakeholder-informed overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) intervention to improve walking function after spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with usual care gait training.
Randomized Controlled Trial.
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility.
Patients (N=106; age, 51.5±18.5y; men, 78.3%; White, 65.1%) with subacute incomplete SCI.
ORE compared with usual care gait training approaches including body-weight support treadmill training and traditional overground modalities.
Our primary outcome was walking performance defined by function [Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury-Revised (WISCI-II)] and gait speed [10-m walk test (10MWT)]. Secondary outcomes were functional independence [Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and CARE Tool] and patient-reported outcomes of pain, fatigue, spasticity, depression, anxiety, and quality of life.
Patients were tetraplegia (56.6%) and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) B (17.9%), AIS C (28.3%), and AIS D (53.8%). Although improvement was observed in both the ORE and usual care groups across WISCI-II, 10MWT, and SCIM measures (all P<.001), there were no significant differences between ORE and usual care gait training on primary and secondary outcomes. Injury severity distinctions were observed for AIS C where the ORE group improved in WISCI-II and SCIM (P=.008 and P<.001, respectively) and the usual care group improved in SCIM (P=.002) only. For AIS D, both groups improved in the WISCI-II, 10MWT, and SCIM (all P<.001). Moderate effects sizes between ORE and usual care gait training were detected for transfer and walking CARE Tool items for people with AIS C injuries.
Corollary to our overall equivalence findings between ORE and usual care gait training, ORE may be a more appropriate gait training intervention for patients with AIS C to promote recovery of walking function during inpatient rehabilitation.
与常规护理步态训练相比,研究利益相关者参与设计的地面机器人外骨骼(ORE)干预对改善脊髓损伤(SCI)后步行功能的疗效。
随机对照试验。
住院康复机构。
亚急性不完全性SCI患者(N = 106;年龄,51.5±18.5岁;男性,78.3%;白人,65.1%)。
ORE与常规护理步态训练方法进行比较,常规护理步态训练方法包括体重支持跑步机训练和传统地面训练方式。
我们的主要结局是由功能[脊髓损伤步行指数修订版(WISCI-II)]和步态速度[10米步行试验(10MWT)]定义的步行表现。次要结局是功能独立性[脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)和CARE工具]以及患者报告的疼痛、疲劳、痉挛、抑郁、焦虑和生活质量结局。
患者为四肢瘫(56.6%),美国脊髓损伤协会损伤分级(AIS)为B级(17.9%)、C级(28.3%)和D级(53.8%)。尽管在ORE组和常规护理组中,WISCI-II、10MWT和SCIM测量指标均有改善(所有P<0.001),但ORE与常规护理步态训练在主要和次要结局上无显著差异。在AIS C损伤严重程度方面观察到差异,ORE组在WISCI-II和SCIM方面有所改善(分别为P = 0.008和P<0.001),而常规护理组仅在SCIM方面有所改善(P = 0.002)。对于AIS D损伤,两组在WISCI-II、10MWT和SCIM方面均有改善(所有P<0.001)。对于AIS C损伤患者,在转移和步行CARE工具项目方面,检测到ORE与常规护理步态训练之间有中等效应量。
鉴于我们在ORE与常规护理步态训练之间的总体等效性研究结果,ORE可能是AIS C级患者在住院康复期间促进步行功能恢复的更合适的步态训练干预措施。