Babu A R, Bharathi M B, Sandhya D, Naveen A, Amulya T M, Amrutha H R, Gokhul V
JSS University: JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, Karnataka India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May;77(5):2013-2019. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05414-7. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
To assess the quality of life and severity of dysphagia in patients utilizing the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire. This longitudinal study evaluated individuals before swallowing therapy and after one week, two weeks, and one month after the procedure. Data collection included validated assessment instruments, with statistical analysis utilizing chi-square tests for categorical variables and repeated measures ANOVA for SWAL-QOL scores over time intervals. The study population primarily consisted of patients aged 61-80, with a marginal male predominance. Cerebrovascular accident was the most common diagnosis, followed by bronchopneumonia and traumatic brain injury. Preliminary GUSS scores revealed moderate to severe dysphagia in the majority of subjects. Following the intervention, GUSS ratings showed a gradual transition to less severe categories, whereas SWAL-QOL scores revealed statistically significant enhancement, signifying improved quality of life. Notable connections were observed between initial GUSS scores and diagnosis, hypertension, and alcohol intake. The study underscores the significant influence of dysphagia on quality of life and illustrates the efficacy of swallowing therapy in enhancing food selection, sleep, and fatigue. Psychological support from family, healthcare professionals, and colleagues is essential, especially around mealtimes. Social assistance mitigates patients' anxiety and alleviates loneliness. Early identification and intervention in high-risk groups are critical for optimal outcomes. An integrated treatment strategy that includes both medical and emotional assistance improves the well-being of dysphagia patients.
利用古根吞咽筛查量表(GUSS)和吞咽生活质量(SWAL-QOL)问卷评估患者的生活质量和吞咽困难的严重程度。这项纵向研究在吞咽治疗前以及治疗后一周、两周和一个月对个体进行了评估。数据收集包括经过验证的评估工具,对分类变量采用卡方检验进行统计分析,对不同时间间隔的SWAL-QOL分数采用重复测量方差分析。研究人群主要由61至80岁的患者组成,男性略占优势。脑血管意外是最常见的诊断,其次是支气管肺炎和创伤性脑损伤。初步的GUSS分数显示,大多数受试者存在中度至重度吞咽困难。干预后,GUSS评分显示逐渐向较轻的类别转变,而SWAL-QOL分数显示出统计学上的显著提高,表明生活质量得到改善。在初始GUSS分数与诊断、高血压和酒精摄入量之间观察到了显著的关联。该研究强调了吞咽困难对生活质量的重大影响,并说明了吞咽治疗在改善食物选择、睡眠和疲劳方面的疗效。来自家人、医护人员和同事的心理支持至关重要,尤其是在进餐时间。社会援助减轻了患者的焦虑并缓解了孤独感。对高危人群进行早期识别和干预对于取得最佳结果至关重要。包括医疗和情感援助在内的综合治疗策略可改善吞咽困难患者的幸福感。