Maniar Adit R, Kazarian Gregory S, Torres-Ramirez Ricardo J, Ranawat Amar S
Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Breach Candy Hospital Trust, Mumbai, India.
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Mar 5;59(5):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01354-0. eCollection 2025 May.
Fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty(rTKA) should occur in at least 2 zones(epiphysis, metaphysis, or diaphysis) to maximize fixation strength. We report here the short-term survivorship of unsupported tibial base plates in rTKA when used with a cementless metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing rTKA between 2014 and 2021 by a single surgeon at a single institute. We identified 17 patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
The average age at surgery was 66.4 years (range 50-80) and the average BMI was 34.6 (range 22.4-43.3). One patient had Type 1 and 16 patients had Type 2 bone loss preoperatively (Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification). Two patients (11.8%) received a standard posterior stabilized insert, nine patients (52.9%) received a varus valgus constrained insert and the remaining 6 (35.3%) patients received a hinged implant. There were no cases of revision for loosening, fracture or mechanical failure of the tibial component construct at an average follow up of 2.9 years (maximum 7.9 years). One patient required revision for end of stem pain. Only 1 patient developed subsidence (≤ 3 mm) but did not have any clinical mechanical symptoms suggestive of loosening.
We report a 100% survivorship free of revision for loosening or mechanical failure of the tibial construct at short term follow up when using an unsupported tibial base plate with a metaphyseal sleeve and non-cemented stem. Based on early data, metaphyseal sleeves with a stable stem fixation in the tibia can be used without additional tibial tray fixation with cement.
翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)中的固定应至少在两个区域(骨骺、干骺端或骨干)进行,以最大化固定强度。我们在此报告rTKA中无支撑胫骨基板与无水泥干骺端套筒和无水泥柄配合使用时的短期生存率。
我们回顾性分析了2014年至2021年间在单一机构由单一外科医生进行rTKA手术的所有患者。我们确定了17例患者,其最短随访时间为1年。
手术时的平均年龄为66.4岁(范围50 - 80岁),平均体重指数为34.6(范围22.4 - 43.3)。术前1例患者为1型骨缺损,16例患者为2型骨缺损(安德森骨科研究所分类)。2例患者(11.8%)接受了标准后稳定型衬垫,9例患者(52.9%)接受了内外翻受限衬垫,其余6例患者(35.3%)接受了铰链式植入物。在平均2.9年(最长7.9年)的随访中,没有因胫骨部件结构松动、骨折或机械故障而进行翻修的病例。1例患者因柄端疼痛需要翻修。只有1例患者出现下沉(≤3mm),但没有任何提示松动的临床机械症状。
我们报告,在短期随访中,当使用无支撑胫骨基板与干骺端套筒和无水泥柄时,胫骨结构因松动或机械故障而进行翻修的生存率为100%。基于早期数据,胫骨中具有稳定柄固定的干骺端套筒可以在不使用水泥进行额外胫骨托固定的情况下使用。