Barath K, Kumar M N, Krishnamurthy Sunil Lakshmipura
Department of Orthopaedics, Hosmat Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Chandramma Dayanada Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research (CDSIMER), Dayananda Sagar University, Harohalli, Ramanagara, India.
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Feb 7;59(5):627-634. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01339-z. eCollection 2025 May.
Tibial plateau fractures can indeed be quite complex, and their management is critical for ensuring optimal outcomes. The management of subchondral cavities following the elevation of depressed plateau fragments is challenging. There are various options to manage the defect, autologous cortico-cancellous bone transfer, bone graft substitutes, and modification of internal fixation techniques in order to minimize the degree of subchondral collapse and articular incongruity.
A longitudinal prospective study was conducted at our institute. All patients with closed Schatzker type 2 and 3 tibial plateau fractures with articular depression <20 mm were alternatively assigned into two groups, by matching fracture types. Without bone graft, the group underwent treatment in the form of open reduction and plating for lateral condyle fracture. The bone graft group underwent additional bone grafting apart from plating. Each group had 20 patients. Patients were followed at regular intervals of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and until fracture union.
By comparing our results between the two groups, we found that there was no significant difference between groups with and without bone grafting for internal fixation of depressed <20 mm type II and type III tibial plateau fractures. The functional and radiological outcomes, time to union, and complication rates were similar in the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
For osteosynthesis of depressed tibial plateau fractures, Schatzker type 2 and type 3 with depression of <20 mm, internal fixation without bone graft is a viable option. There is no statistically significant difference in functional and radiological outcomes between bone grafting and non bone grafting group.
胫骨平台骨折确实可能相当复杂,其治疗对于确保最佳治疗效果至关重要。塌陷的平台骨折块复位后软骨下骨缺损的处理具有挑战性。有多种处理缺损的方法,包括自体皮质松质骨移植、骨移植替代物以及改良内固定技术,以尽量减少软骨下塌陷程度和关节面不平整。
在我们研究所进行了一项纵向前瞻性研究。所有闭合性Schatzker 2型和3型胫骨平台骨折且关节面塌陷<20 mm的患者,通过匹配骨折类型被交替分为两组。非植骨组采用切开复位钢板内固定治疗外侧髁骨折。植骨组除钢板内固定外还进行了额外的植骨。每组有20例患者。定期随访患者1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月,直至骨折愈合。
通过比较两组结果,我们发现对于II型和III型胫骨平台骨折塌陷<20 mm的切开复位内固定,植骨组和非植骨组之间无显著差异。两组的功能和影像学结果、愈合时间及并发症发生率相似,组间无统计学显著差异。
对于Schatzker 2型和3型、塌陷<20 mm的胫骨平台骨折切开复位内固定,不植骨是一种可行的选择。植骨组和非植骨组在功能和影像学结果方面无统计学显著差异。