Park Nahee, Rowe Meghan, Gray Megan M, Ficco Ellie, Sawyer Taylor, Umoren Rachel A
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81625. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81625. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Background Fixed-camera video recordings of neonatal resuscitation have been utilized to facilitate post-event debriefing and evaluate guideline adherence. Traditional video capture is limited in the field of view it provides, requiring multiple cameras to capture the relevant steps of the resuscitation. Objective We sought to examine the feasibility of a 360° video camera (360V) (Gear 360, Samsung, Vietnam) compared to a traditional two-view standard video camera (SVC) (SimView Mobile Camera, Laerdal Medical, New York) as a method for recording neonatal resuscitation and capturing salient resuscitation factors. Methods This observational study recorded neonatal resuscitation events in a simulated delivery room. Each simulation was recorded by two methods: near- and far-view SVC and 360V. Two independent reviewers analyzed the videos for visibility of Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) steps, audibility, and recording quality of predefined resuscitation events and behaviors. Global visualization and audibility scores were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Results A total of 25 simulated neonatal resuscitation events were reviewed. The average global visualization of NRP steps was higher using 360V than with two-view SVC (4.26 vs. 3.33, P = 0.0001). Average global audibility using 360V was also higher than with two-view SVC (4.90 vs. 4.21, P < 0.0001). Motion sickness more often occurred while viewing 360V videos compared to two-view SVC videos (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). However, motion sickness was overall a rare occurrence. Conclusions Average global visualization and audibility were improved using 360V compared to two-view SVC. A 360V is a superior method for reviewing neonatal resuscitation simulations compared to two-view SVC. A limitation of the study is that the location of the SVC in the room may not reflect the ideal placement for capturing visual aspects of neonatal resuscitation. Placement of the camera on the warmer may have yielded different results. Further studies comparing various SVC placements to 360V are warranted.
新生儿复苏的固定摄像头视频记录已被用于促进事后总结汇报并评估指南遵循情况。传统视频捕捉所提供的视野有限，需要多个摄像头才能捕捉到复苏的相关步骤。目的：我们试图研究360°摄像机（360V）（Gear 360，三星，越南）与传统双视角标准摄像机（SVC）（SimView移动摄像机，Laerdal Medical，纽约）相比，作为记录新生儿复苏和捕捉显著复苏因素的一种方法的可行性。方法：这项观察性研究在模拟产房记录新生儿复苏事件。每次模拟都通过两种方法进行记录：近景和远景SVC以及360V。两名独立的评审员分析视频中新生儿复苏项目（NRP）步骤的可见性、可听性以及预定义复苏事件和行为的记录质量。使用五点李克特量表分析整体可视化和可听性评分。结果：共审查了25次模拟新生儿复苏事件。使用360V时NRP步骤的平均整体可视化高于双视角SVC（4.26对3.33，P = 0.0001）。使用360V时的平均整体可听性也高于双视角SVC（4.90对4.21，P < 0.0001）。与双视角SVC视频相比，观看360V视频时更常出现晕动症（P < 0.0001，Fisher精确检验）。然而，晕动症总体上很少见。结论：与双视角SVC相比，使用360V可提高平均整体可视化和可听性。与双视角SVC相比，360V是审查新生儿复苏模拟的更优方法。该研究的一个局限性是，房间内SVC的位置可能无法反映捕捉新生儿复苏视觉方面的理想位置。将摄像头放置在保暖台上可能会产生不同的结果。有必要进一步研究比较各种SVC放置位置与360V的情况。
