Zhang Mingqiang, Zhao Lina, Zeng Pu, Mu Xiangdong, Zhao Jingquan
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, P.R. China.
Biomed Rep. 2025 Apr 22;22(6):101. doi: 10.3892/br.2025.1979. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Bronchial asthma, a widely prevalent respiratory disease influencing individuals of all age groups worldwide, has been increasingly recognized as a global concern. While there exists a potentially heightened risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in asthmatic patients, particularly those with non-allergic asthma, it is uncertain whether COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma has its own unique clinical characteristics. The present study aimed to compare and analyze the pulmonary function and eosinophilic inflammation indices of patients with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma and those with typical bronchial asthma, and further deepen the understanding of COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the pulmonary function and inflammatory characteristics of 116 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma and treated in outpatient clinics after March 2023, as well as 113 patients with typical bronchial asthma diagnosed and treated from January 2022 to November 2022. The main clinical characteristics were cough, sputum, chest tightness, dyspnea and wheezing. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in the total IgE, the absolute value and percentage of eosinophil, transoral FeNO, and trans-nasal FeNO in the peripheral blood samples of patients in the COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma group compared with the typical bronchial asthma group. Although there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of impairment in ventilation function, reserve function, and small airway function, significant differences were identified in various indicators, including forced expiratory volume in 1 sec as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV1%), residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory flow rate at 75% (MEF75), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), FEV * 30, and residual volume (RV) between the two groups. The findings indicated that patients with COVID-19 infection-induced bronchial asthma exhibited a comparatively inferior pulmonary function versus those with typical bronchial asthma. However, it is important to note that the clinical impact of this disparity was not statistically significant.
支气管哮喘是一种在全球范围内广泛流行的呼吸系统疾病,影响着各个年龄段的人群,日益被视为一个全球性问题。虽然哮喘患者,尤其是非过敏性哮喘患者,感染2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)后发生重症的风险可能会增加,但COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘是否有其独特的临床特征尚不确定。本研究旨在比较和分析COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘患者与典型支气管哮喘患者的肺功能和嗜酸性粒细胞炎症指标,进一步加深对COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘的认识。对2023年3月后在门诊治疗的116例诊断为COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘患者以及2022年1月至2022年11月诊断和治疗的113例典型支气管哮喘患者的肺功能和炎症特征进行了回顾性分析。主要临床特征为咳嗽、咳痰、胸闷、呼吸困难和喘息。两组临床特征差异无统计学意义。结果表明,与典型支气管哮喘组相比,COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘组患者外周血样本中的总IgE、嗜酸性粒细胞绝对值和百分比、经口呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)和经鼻FeNO差异无统计学意义。虽然两组通气功能、储备功能和小气道功能的损害率差异无统计学意义,但两组在多项指标上存在显著差异,包括第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%)、残气量/肺总量(RV/TLC)、呼气峰值流速(PEF)、75%最大呼气流量(MEF75)、最大自主通气量(MVV)、FEV * 30和残气量(RV)。研究结果表明,与典型支气管哮喘患者相比,COVID-19感染诱发的支气管哮喘患者的肺功能相对较差。然而,需要注意的是,这种差异的临床影响在统计学上并不显著。