Okawa Shoki, Noda Issei, Nariyama Yuki, Kitayama Soichiro, Inada Toru, Kudo Shintarou
Ashiya Orthopedic Sports Clinic, Japan.
Inclusive Medical Science Research Institute, Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2025 May;37(5):209-214. doi: 10.1589/jpts.37.209. Epub 2025 May 1.
[Purpose] The mechanism of action and the position and site of Radial pressure wave therapy are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of shoulder position on muscle stiffness after radial pressure wave therapy. [Participants and Methods] This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial included 32 orthopedic clinic participants. Using the block replacement method, patients were randomly assigned to a stretching group (IR group) or a shortening group (0 group) in a 1:1 ratio. Muscle stiffness was measured using ultrasonography (GE LOGIQ S8) with a 9 MHz linear transducer in B mode. Measurements were performed along the long axes of the teres minor, infraspinatus, and deltoid muscles. Radial pressure wave therapy were applied only to the teres minor (3.0 bar, 12 Hz, 2,000 shots). Muscle stiffness testers were blinded to the upper limb position during Radial pressure wave therapy. [Results] Teres minor muscle stiffness was significantly decreased within and between groups, and the deltoid muscle stiffness was significantly decreased within groups in the IR group. [Conclusion] Radial pressure wave therapy applied with the muscle extended reduced muscle stiffness more than Radial pressure wave therapy applied in the shortening position.
[目的] 桡侧压力波疗法的作用机制以及其作用的位置和位点尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估肩部位置对桡侧压力波疗法后肌肉僵硬程度的影响。[参与者与方法] 这项随机、双盲、平行组对照试验纳入了32名骨科门诊参与者。采用区组置换法,患者按1:1比例随机分为拉伸组(IR组)或缩短组(0组)。使用配备9 MHz线性探头的超声(GE LOGIQ S8)在B模式下测量肌肉僵硬程度。沿着小圆肌、冈下肌和三角肌的长轴进行测量。仅对小圆肌施加桡侧压力波疗法(3.0巴,12 赫兹,2000次冲击)。在桡侧压力波疗法期间,肌肉僵硬程度测试者对上肢位置不知情。[结果] 两组内及组间小圆肌的肌肉僵硬程度均显著降低,IR组内三角肌的肌肉僵硬程度也显著降低。[结论] 肌肉伸展状态下进行的桡侧压力波疗法比肌肉缩短状态下进行的桡侧压力波疗法更能有效降低肌肉僵硬程度。