Suppr超能文献

反向全肩关节置换术后主动外旋时的肌肉活动模式:小圆肌及相关肌肉的电生理学研究。

Muscle activation patterns during active external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an electrophysiological study of the teres minor and associated musculature.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.

College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Mar;33(3):583-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.031. Epub 2023 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preoperative teres minor insufficiency has been identified as a risk factor for poor restoration of external rotation (ER) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, there has been little investigation regarding muscle activation patterns generating ER. This prospective study sought to determine the timing and activation levels of the shoulder girdle musculature during ER in well-functioning RTSAs with an intact teres minor using a lateralized design.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RTSA ≥1 year previously with functional ER, an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score >70, superior rotator cuff deficiency, and an intact teres minor were identified. Electrophysiological and kinematic analyses were performed during ER in the modified neutral position (arm at side with 90° of elbow flexion) and in abduction (AB) (shoulder abducted 90° with 90° of elbow flexion). Dynamometer-recorded torque and position were pattern matched to electromyography during ER. The root-mean-square and integrated electromyography (in microvolts × milliseconds with standard deviation [SD]), as well as median frequency (MF) (in hertz with SD), were calculated to determine muscle recruitment. Pair-wise t test analysis compared muscle activation (P < .05 indicated significance).

RESULTS

After an a priori power analysis, 16 patients were recruited. The average ASES score, visual analog scale pain score, and ASES subscore for ER in AB ("comb hair") were 87.7, 0.5, and 2.75 of 3, respectively. In AB, muscle activation began with the upper trapezius, middle trapezius, and latissimus dorsi, followed by the anterior deltoid activating to neutral. With ER beyond neutral, the teres major (9.6 μV × ms; SD, 9.2 μV × ms) initiated ER, followed by the teres minor (14.1 μV × ms; SD, 18.2 μV × ms) and posterior deltoid (11.1 μV × ms; SD, 9.3 μV × ms). MF analysis indicated equal contributions of the teres major (1.1 Hz; SD, 0.5 Hz), teres minor (1.2 Hz; SD, 0.4 Hz), and posterior deltoid (1.1 Hz; SD, 0.4 Hz) in ER beyond neutral. In the modified neutral position, the upper trapezius and middle trapezius were not recruited to the same level as in AB. For ER beyond neutral, the teres major (9.5 μV × ms [SD, 9 μV × ms]; MF, 1.1 Hz [SD, 0.5 Hz]), teres minor (11.4 μV × ms [SD, 15.1 μV × ms]; MF, 1.1 Hz [SD, 0.5 Hz]), and posterior deltoid (8.5 μV × ms [SD, 8 μV × ms]; MF, 1.2 Hz [SD, 0.3 Hz]) were activated in similar sequence and intensity as AB. No differences in muscle activation duration or intensity were noted among the teres major, teres minor, and posterior deltoid (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Active ER after RTSA is complex and is not governed by a single muscle-tendon unit. This study establishes a sequence, duration, and intensity of muscle activation for ER in well-functioning RTSAs. In both tested positions, the teres major, teres minor, and posterior deltoid function equally and sequentially to power ER.

摘要

背景

术前小圆肌功能不全已被确定为反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后外旋(ER)恢复不良的危险因素。然而,对于产生 ER 的肌肉激活模式,研究甚少。本前瞻性研究旨在使用侧化设计确定在功能良好的 RTSA 中,小圆肌完整的情况下,在 ER 期间肩带肌肉的时间和激活水平。

方法

确定了 16 名患者,他们在 RTSA 后至少 1 年,具有功能 ER、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分>70、上旋转袖缺损和小圆肌完整。在改良中立位(手臂在侧,肘部弯曲 90°)和外展(AB)(肩部外展 90°,肘部弯曲 90°)期间进行肌电生理和运动学分析。测力记录的扭矩和位置与 ER 期间的肌电图相匹配。均方根和积分肌电图(以微伏×毫秒和标准差[SD]表示)以及中值频率(MF)(以赫兹和 SD 表示)用于确定肌肉募集。配对 t 检验分析比较肌肉激活(P<.05 表示有显著性差异)。

结果

在进行了事先的功效分析后,招募了 16 名患者。平均 ASES 评分、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分和 AB(“梳子发”)中 ER 的 ASES 亚评分分别为 3 分中的 87.7、0.5 和 2.75。在 AB 中,肌肉激活始于上斜方肌、中斜方肌和背阔肌,然后三角肌前束向中立位激活。当 ER 超过中立位时,大圆肌(9.6 μV×ms;SD,9.2 μV×ms)开始 ER,然后是小圆肌(14.1 μV×ms;SD,18.2 μV×ms)和三角肌后束(11.1 μV×ms;SD,9.3 μV×ms)。MF 分析表明,大圆肌(1.1 Hz;SD,0.5 Hz)、小圆肌(1.2 Hz;SD,0.4 Hz)和三角肌后束(1.1 Hz;SD,0.4 Hz)在 ER 超过中立位时的贡献相等。在改良中立位,上斜方肌和中斜方肌的募集水平与 AB 不同。对于 ER 超过中立位,大圆肌(9.5 μV×ms[SD,9 μV×ms];MF,1.1 Hz[SD,0.5 Hz])、小圆肌(11.4 μV×ms[SD,15.1 μV×ms];MF,1.1 Hz[SD,0.5 Hz])和三角肌后束(8.5 μV×ms[SD,8 μV×ms];MF,1.2 Hz[SD,0.3 Hz])以类似的顺序和强度激活。大圆肌、小圆肌和三角肌后束的肌肉激活持续时间和强度无差异(P>.05)。

结论

RTSA 后的主动 ER 是复杂的,不受单一肌肉-肌腱单位的控制。本研究确立了功能良好的 RTSA 中 ER 的激活顺序、持续时间和强度。在两种测试位置,大圆肌、小圆肌和三角肌后束以相等的顺序和强度共同作用以产生 ER。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验