Suppr超能文献

上下视角:主观流动性以及阶级、种族和性别不平等的解释

The View from Above and Below: Subjective Mobility and Explanations of Class, Race, and Gender Inequality.

作者信息

Hiltner Sofia, Cech Erin A

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Room 3115 LSA Building, 500 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382.

出版信息

Soc Forces. 2024 Dec;103(2):449-474. doi: 10.1093/sf/soae075. Epub 2024 May 27.

Abstract

Popular explanations of inequality as the result of individual failings rather than structural processes are powerful cultural mechanisms that legitimize and reproduce inequality in the United States. How might individuals' experiences of downward or upward mobility shape the explanations they give? We argue that perceived experiences of economic mobility may not only shape how Americans understand economic inequality but may also impact their beliefs about social inequalities more broadly. Using proportionally representative survey data of 1110 U.S. residents, we find that those who perceive that they currently occupy a lower economic class than when they were growing up (i.e., they experienced subjective downward mobility) were more likely than class-stable individuals to reject individualistic explanations of economic inequality and embrace structural ones. By contrast, the upwardly mobile were more likely to reject structural explanations. We find that mobility is similarly related to the likelihood of giving individualistic or structural explanations for and inequality as well. Downward mobility is also associated with greater support of redistributive policies related to economic as well as gender and race inequality. These findings suggest that economic mobility may influence popular explanations of inequality and support for redistributive policy not only related to class inequality but for multiple axes of inequality.

摘要

将不平等解释为个人失败而非结构性过程的结果,这种流行观点是强大的文化机制,在美国使不平等合法化并使其不断延续。个人的向下或向上流动经历会如何影响他们给出的解释呢?我们认为,经济流动的感知经历不仅可能塑造美国人对经济不平等的理解,还可能更广泛地影响他们对社会不平等的看法。通过对1110名美国居民进行具有比例代表性的调查数据,我们发现,那些认为自己目前所处的经济阶层比成长时更低的人(即经历了主观上的向下流动),比阶层稳定的人更有可能拒绝经济不平等的个人主义解释,而接受结构性解释。相比之下,向上流动的人更有可能拒绝结构性解释。我们还发现,流动与对 和 不平等给出个人主义或结构性解释的可能性也有类似的关系。向下流动还与对与经济以及性别和种族不平等相关的再分配政策的更大支持有关。这些发现表明,经济流动可能不仅影响对阶级不平等,而且对多种不平等轴的不平等的流行解释以及对再分配政策的支持。

相似文献

1
The View from Above and Below: Subjective Mobility and Explanations of Class, Race, and Gender Inequality.
Soc Forces. 2024 Dec;103(2):449-474. doi: 10.1093/sf/soae075. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Does income inequality increase status anxiety? Not directly, the role of perceived upward and downward mobility.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1453-1468. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12641. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Race, Intergenerational Social Mobility and Stressful Life Events.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 Sep 20;8(10):86. doi: 10.3390/bs8100086.
4
Reducing economic inequality is 'just right': Moral conviction predicts support for redistributive government policies.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):1076-1096. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12620. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Framing economic inequality and policy as group disadvantages (versus group advantages) spurs support for action.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):349-360. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00988-4. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Racial Inequality Trends and the Intergenerational Persistence of Income and Family Structure.
Am Sociol Rev. 2014 Dec;79(6):1196-1225. doi: 10.1177/0003122414554947.
7
Building a more mobile America--one income quintile at a time.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1177/1745691614562005.
8
Individual values predict desiring more economic inequality: The moderator role of social mobility.
Int J Psychol. 2024 Jun;59(3):398-409. doi: 10.1002/ijop.13114. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jan;59(1):111-136. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12326. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
Intergenerational social mobility and health in Russia: Mind over matter?
Adv Life Course Res. 2021 Mar;47:100390. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100390. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 7;117(1):251-258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905094116. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Statistical challenges in modelling the health consequences of social mobility: the need for diagonal reference models.
Int J Public Health. 2017 Dec;62(9):1029-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1018-x. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
What fosters concern for inequality among American adolescents?
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jan;61:160-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验