Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Public Health. 2017 Dec;62(9):1029-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1018-x. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
Various studies on the health consequences of socio-economic position address social mobility. They aim to uncover whether health outcomes are affected by: (1) social mobility, besides, (2) social origin, and (3) social destination. Conventional methods do not, however, estimate these three effects separately, which may produce invalid conclusions. We highlight that diagonal reference models (DRMs) overcome this problem, which we illustrate by focusing on overweight/obesity (OWOB).
Using conventional methods (logistic-regression analyses with dummy variables) and DRMs, we examine the effects of intergenerational educational mobility on OWOB (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m) using survey data representative of the Dutch population aged 18-45 (1569 males, 1771 females).
Conventional methods suggest that mobility effects on OWOB are present. Analyses with DRMs, however, indicate that no such effects exist.
Conventional analyses of the health consequences of social mobility may produce invalid results. We, therefore, recommend the use of DRMs. DRMs also validly estimate the health consequences of other types of social mobility (e.g. intra- and intergenerational occupational and income mobility) and status inconsistency (e.g. in educational or occupational attainment between partners).
多项关于社会经济地位对健康影响的研究涉及到社会流动性。它们旨在揭示健康结果是否受到以下三个因素的影响:(1)社会流动,(2)社会出身,和(3)社会归宿。然而,传统方法无法分别估计这三个效应,这可能导致无效的结论。我们强调,对角线参考模型(DRMs)可以克服这个问题,我们将通过关注超重/肥胖(OWOB)来举例说明。
使用传统方法(使用哑变量的逻辑回归分析)和 DRMs,我们使用代表荷兰 18-45 岁人口的调查数据(男性 1569 人,女性 1771 人),检验代际教育流动对 OWOB(BMI≥25kg/m2)的影响。
传统方法表明,流动对 OWOB 的影响是存在的。然而,DRMs 的分析表明,这种影响并不存在。
对社会流动对健康影响的传统分析可能会产生无效的结果。因此,我们建议使用 DRMs。DRMs 还可以有效地估计其他类型的社会流动(例如,职业和收入的代内和代际流动)和地位不一致(例如,伴侣之间在教育或职业成就方面的不一致)的健康后果。