Suppr超能文献

卡马西平咀嚼片与普通片剂的生物等效性:单剂量和稳态研究。

Bioequivalence of carbamazepine chewable and conventional tablets: single-dose and steady-state studies.

作者信息

Chan K K, Sawchuk R J, Thompson T A, Redalieu E, Wagner W E, LeSher A R, Weeks B J, Hall N R, Gerardin A

出版信息

J Pharm Sci. 1985 Aug;74(8):866-70. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600740813.

Abstract

Single-dose and steady-state studies were carried out on separate occasions to examine the bioequivalence of the newly formulated carbamazepine chewable tablet. In the single-dose study, the plasma levels resulting from 2 X 200-mg conventional tablets (CT), 4 X 100-mg chewable tablets swallowed whole (SW), and 4 X 100-mg chewable tablets chewed before swallowing (CHEW) were compared. A randomized 3 X 3 Latin-square design balanced for residual effects, with a 3-week washout period, was used (n = 6). Plasma samples were analyzed by a specific GC method for carbamazepine. The following parameters were used for evaluation: AUC, Cmax, tmax, and t1/2. None of the parameters were significantly different except Cmax and t1/2 values for CHEW and CT. The Cmax was 25% higher and t1/2 was 11% shorter for CHEW than CT. The impact of differences in the peak plasma levels at steady state were examined by pharmacokinetic projection (400 mg b.i.d.) based on the single-dose data and with simulated induction equal to a 50% reduction in t1/2. The projected steady-state CT and CHEW plasma concentrations were similar, with a difference of only 4%. The results demonstrate the bioequivalence of the dosage forms with respect to the extent of absorption, and similar steady-state concentrations of carbamazepine in plasma can be expected. To test the conclusion from the projected study, a separate bioequivalence study to compare CHEW relative to CT was performed at steady state in normal volunteers (200 mg b.i.d.).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

分别进行了单剂量和稳态研究,以检验新配方卡马西平咀嚼片的生物等效性。在单剂量研究中,比较了2片200毫克常规片剂(CT)、4片100毫克整片吞服的咀嚼片(SW)以及4片100毫克咀嚼后吞服的咀嚼片(CHEW)所产生的血浆水平。采用了一种随机3×3拉丁方设计,平衡残留效应,洗脱期为3周(n = 6)。血浆样本通过一种针对卡马西平的特定气相色谱法进行分析。以下参数用于评估:AUC、Cmax、tmax和t1/2。除了CHEW和CT的Cmax和t1/2值外,其他参数均无显著差异。CHEW的Cmax比CT高25%,t1/2比CT短11%。基于单剂量数据并通过模拟诱导使t1/2降低50%,通过药代动力学预测(每日两次,每次400毫克)研究了稳态时血浆峰值水平差异的影响。预测的稳态CT和CHEW血浆浓度相似,差异仅为4%。结果表明这些剂型在吸收程度方面具有生物等效性,并且可以预期血浆中卡马西平的稳态浓度相似。为了验证预测研究的结论,在正常志愿者中进行了一项单独的生物等效性研究,以比较稳态时CHEW相对于CT的情况(每日两次,每次200毫克)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验