• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于分肾功能的方法预测根治性肾输尿管切除术后新的基线肾小球滤过率

A Split Renal Function-Based Approach for Predicting New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy.

作者信息

Lewis Kieran, Siva Jayant, Bartholomew Angelica, Wong Anne, Munoz Lopez Carlos, Kazama Akira, Rathi Nityam, Maina Eran N, Campbell Rebecca A, Heller Nicholas, Scovell Jason M, Abouassaly Robert, Almassi Nima, Haywood Samuel C, Weight Christopher J, Campbell Steven C

机构信息

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Division of Molecular Oncology, Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Japan.

出版信息

Urol Pract. 2025 May 5:101097UPJ0000000000000826. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826.

DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826
PMID:40323105
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accurate prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate (NBGFR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is important for managing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) because it can inform timing of systemic chemotherapy. Current prediction models do not account for split renal function (SRF) and show modest accuracy. This study evaluates the accuracy of an SRF-based model, PVA, which incorporates both parenchymal volume analysis (PVA) and degree of parenchymal enhancement.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with UTUC (n = 712) managed with RNU (2013-2023) and included patients with (1) contrast-enhanced CT < 1 year preoperatively, (2) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 3 months preoperatively, and (3) NBGFR 1 to 12 months postoperatively. Predicted NBGFR was 1.25 × (GFR) × (SRF), with 1.25 representing the average renal functional compensation after nephrectomy. For PVA, differential parenchymal volumes and degree of enhancement were estimated using semiautomated software. SRF-based models (based on PVA, PVA alone, or nuclear renal scans) and a non-SRF-based algorithm were compared using a 20% accuracy threshold.

RESULTS

Among patients analyzed (n = 352), the median preoperative GFR was 63 mL/min/1.73 m, 101 (29%) had moderate/severe hydronephrosis, and 42 (12%) had infiltrative renal masses (IRMs). For prediction of NBGFR after RNU, PVA demonstrated superior accuracy (84%) compared with PVA alone (accuracy = 79%, < .05), nuclear renal scans-based approach (accuracy = 73%, < .01), and non-SRF-based algorithm (accuracy = 65%, < .01). Among patients with hydronephrosis, notable improvements were observed for PVA compared with PVA alone (accuracies 88%/61%, respectively, ≤ .01). For IRMs, PVA seemed to be equivalent to other approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU.

CONCLUSIONS

PVA incorporates both differential renal function (degree of enhancement) and parenchymal volumes and outperforms other SRF-based and non-SRF-based approaches for predicting NBGFR after RNU. These findings alleviate concerns that the prevalence of hydronephrosis and IRMs in this population reduces accuracy of SRF-based approaches. PVA can inform counseling about the timing of systemic chemotherapy in patients with high-risk UTUC.

摘要

引言

根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后新的基线肾小球滤过率(NBGFR)的准确预测对于上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的管理很重要,因为它可以为全身化疗的时机提供依据。目前的预测模型没有考虑分肾功能(SRF),准确性一般。本研究评估了基于SRF的模型PVA的准确性,该模型结合了实质体积分析(PVA)和实质强化程度。

方法

我们回顾了2013年至2023年接受RNU治疗的UTUC患者(n = 712),纳入了符合以下条件的患者:(1)术前1年内的对比增强CT;(2)术前3个月内的肾小球滤过率(GFR);(3)术后1至12个月的NBGFR。预测的NBGFR为1.25×(GFR)×(SRF),其中1.25代表肾切除术后的平均肾功能代偿。对于PVA,使用半自动软件估计不同的实质体积和强化程度。使用20%的准确性阈值比较基于SRF的模型(基于PVA、单独的PVA或核肾扫描)和基于非SRF的算法。

结果

在分析的患者(n = 352)中,术前GFR的中位数为63 mL/min/1.73 m²,101例(29%)有中度/重度肾积水,42例(12%)有浸润性肾肿块(IRM)。对于RNU后NBGFR的预测,PVA显示出更高的准确性(84%),高于单独的PVA(准确性 = 79%,P <.05)、基于核肾扫描的方法(准确性 = 73%,P <.01)和基于非SRF的算法(准确性 = 65%,P <.01)。在肾积水患者中,与单独的PVA相比,PVA有显著改善(准确性分别为88%/61%,P ≤.01)。对于IRM,PVA在预测RNU后NBGFR方面似乎与其他方法相当。

结论

PVA结合了不同的肾功能(强化程度)和实质体积,在预测RNU后NBGFR方面优于其他基于SRF和非SRF的方法。这些发现减轻了对该人群中肾积水和IRM的患病率会降低基于SRF方法准确性的担忧。PVA可为高危UTUC患者全身化疗时机的咨询提供依据。

相似文献

1
A Split Renal Function-Based Approach for Predicting New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephroureterectomy.一种基于分肾功能的方法预测根治性肾输尿管切除术后新的基线肾小球滤过率
Urol Pract. 2025 May 5:101097UPJ0000000000000826. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000826.
2
Degree of contrast enhancement improves prediction of new baseline glomerular filtration rate following radical nephrectomy.
BJU Int. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1111/bju.16846.
3
Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel.保留肾单位手术与根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局:EAU 非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1052-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Limitations of Parenchymal Volume Analysis for Estimating Split Renal Function and New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate After Radical Nephrectomy.实质体积分析在估计根治性肾切除术后分肾功能和新的肾小球滤过率基线方面的局限性。
J Urol. 2024 Jun;211(6):775-783. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003903. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
Optimizing prediction of new-baseline glomerular filtration rate after radical nephrectomy: are algorithms really necessary?优化根治性肾切除术后新基线肾小球滤过率的预测:算法真的有必要吗?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;54(10):2537-2545. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03298-y. Epub 2022 Jul 17.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.对上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术术后肿瘤学及肾功能结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Predicting GFR after radical nephrectomy: the importance of split renal function.预测根治性肾切除术后的肾小球滤过率:分肾功能的重要性。
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):1011-1018. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03918-9. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Benefit and Harms of Radical Nephroureterectomy as Part of a Multimodal Treatment Strategy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Presenting with Clinical Evidence of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the European Association of Urology Guidelines.根治性肾输尿管切除术作为多模式治疗策略一部分对出现区域淋巴结转移临床证据的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的获益与危害:欧洲泌尿外科学会指南的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Jun;8(3):841-852. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
9
Point of care parenchymal volume analyses to estimate split renal function and predict functional outcomes after radical nephrectomy.利用床边实质体积分析评估分肾功能,并预测根治性肾切除术后的功能结局。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33236-6.
10
Oncologic and renal function outcomes of segmental ureterectomy vs. radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.上尿路尿路上皮癌节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学和肾功能结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Oncol. 2025 Sep;43(9):498-510. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.05.011. Epub 2025 Jun 12.