Suppr超能文献

对上尿路尿路上皮癌行节段性输尿管切除术与根治性肾输尿管切除术术后肿瘤学及肾功能结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and renal function outcomes obtained after segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

作者信息

Fang D, Seisen T, Yang K, Liu P, Fan X, Singla N, Xiong G, Zhang L, Li X, Zhou L

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, No. 8 Xishiku St, Xicheng District, Beijing 100034, China.

Academic Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, APHP, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris F-75013, France; UPMC University Paris 06, GRC5, ONCOTYPE-Uro, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, Paris F-75005, France.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;42(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative studies reporting oncological and renal function outcomes of segmental ureterectomy (SU) versus radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search on Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane library was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, and a meta-analysis was performed to assess cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), intravesical recurrence free survival (IVRFS) and surgery-related variations in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

A total of 11 retrospective studies with 3963 patients who underwent either SU (n = 983; 24.8%) or RNU (n = 2980; 75.2%) were included. Although patients treated with SU were more likely to be diagnosed with favorable pathological features, the meta-analysis of unadjusted data revealed no significant difference between both groups in terms of CSS (HR 0.90, p = 0.33) and OS (HR 0.98, p = 0.93). Accordingly, the meta-analysis of adjusted data confirmed equivalent CSS (HR = 0.90, p = 0.47) between SU and RNU. Similarly, no significant difference was found in terms of RFS (HR 1.06, p = 0.72) and IVRFS (HR 1.35, p = 0.39). However, a significant decreased risk of impaired renal function was observed after SU when compared to RNU (mean eGFR difference = 9.32 ml/1.73 m, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Although adverse patient and tumor characteristics were not equally balanced between treatment arms, our systematic review and meta-analysis supports similar oncological outcomes between SU and RNU, with better preservation of renal function after SU. As such, SU should be preferably used as the first-line treatment for low-risk ureter tumors, while considered for selected cases of high-risk disease.

摘要

目的

对比较节段性输尿管切除术(SU)与根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的肿瘤学和肾功能结局的对照研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

材料与方法

根据PRISMA指南在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索,并进行荟萃分析以评估癌症特异性生存(CSS)、总生存(OS)、无复发生存(RFS)、膀胱内无复发生存(IVRFS)以及估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的手术相关变化。

结果

共纳入11项回顾性研究,涉及3963例接受SU(n = 983;24.8%)或RNU(n = 2980;75.2%)的患者。尽管接受SU治疗的患者更有可能被诊断为具有良好的病理特征,但未调整数据的荟萃分析显示,两组在CSS(风险比[HR]0.90,p = 0.33)和OS(HR 0.98,p = 0.93)方面无显著差异。因此,调整后数据的荟萃分析证实SU和RNU之间的CSS相当(HR = 0.90,p = 0.47)。同样,在RFS(HR 1.06,p = 0.72)和IVRFS(HR 1.35,p = 0.39)方面未发现显著差异。然而,与RNU相比,SU后观察到肾功能受损风险显著降低(平均eGFR差异 = 9.32 ml/1.73 m²,p = 0.007)。

结论

尽管各治疗组之间患者和肿瘤的不良特征分布不均衡,但我们的系统评价和荟萃分析支持SU和RNU之间具有相似的肿瘤学结局,且SU后肾功能保留更好。因此,SU应优先用作低风险输尿管肿瘤的一线治疗方法,而对于部分高风险疾病病例也可考虑使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2428/7312551/081ad19a55ee/nihms-1592242-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验