• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的癌症症状自我管理系统:一项随机临床试验。

Web-Based Cancer Symptom Self-Management System: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Cella David, Lancki Nicola, Kuharic Maja, Yanez Betina, Bass Michael, Garcia Martha G, Webster Kimberly A, Smith Justin D, O'Connor Mary, Coughlin Ava, Cahue September, Kircher Sheetal, Flores Ann Marie, Penedo Frank J, Jensen Roxanne E, Wilder Smith Ashley, Richardson Kimberly, Barnard Cynthia, George Christopher M, Tsarwhas Dean G, Scholtens Denise, Garcia Sofia F

机构信息

Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258353. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8353.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8353
PMID:40323601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053558/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patients with cancer and cancer survivors frequently experience symptoms that increase the need for health care services and impair quality of life. Effective symptom management is critical for comprehensive patient-centered cancer care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of adding a bilingual (English and Spanish), web-based self-management program to an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated patient-reported outcome for cancer (cPRO) assessment in reducing symptom burden and health care resource use (HCRU).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This patient-level randomized clinical trial was performed at the Northwestern Memorial HealthCare system in Chicago, Illinois. Participants included 1614 adult patients with cancer or cancer survivors in 30 clinics who were enrolled between April 1, 2020, and April 8, 2023, and followed up for 12 months until May 8, 2024.

INTERVENTIONS

Usual care (UC) consisting of an EHR-integrated cPRO assessment or enhanced care (EC), which offered an additional tailored web-based self-management program.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and physical function collected at baseline and monthly for 12 months. Secondary outcomes included HCRU measures (inpatient and/or observation visits and days, emergency department and/or urgent care visits, and days of hospital stay).

RESULTS

A total of 1614 patients were included in the analysis, with 804 randomized to EC and 810 to UC. The mean (SD) age was 61 (13) years; 1095 patients (67.8%) were female. Only 419 EC participants (52.1%) accessed the website, with only 197 (47%) returning; the median time per visit was 45 seconds (IQR, 45-105 seconds). There were no statistically significant differences between EC and UC across the cPRO outcomes over 12 months. The mean change from baseline at each assessment time point for treatment effects (EC vs UC) ranged from -0.19 (95% CI, -0.86 to 0.33; P = .64) for physical function to 0.11 (95% CI, -0.75 to 0.79; P = .87) for fatigue. Zero-inflated negative binomial and logistic regression models showed no significant differences in HCRU outcomes: inpatient and/or observation visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72-1.12), emergency department and/or urgent care visits (IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84-1.16), and days of hospital stay (IRR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, adding a bilingual web-based self-management program to EHR-integrated cPRO did not reduce symptom burden or HCRU compared with cPRO alone. Low engagement with the web-based program highlights the need for strategies to enhance engagement and tailor interventions to those who would benefit most.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03988543.

摘要

重要性

癌症患者和癌症幸存者经常出现一些症状,这些症状增加了对医疗服务的需求并损害生活质量。有效的症状管理对于以患者为中心的全面癌症护理至关重要。

目的

评估在电子健康记录(EHR)集成的癌症患者报告结局(cPRO)评估中添加基于网络的双语(英语和西班牙语)自我管理计划对减轻症状负担和医疗资源使用(HCRU)的有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:这项患者层面的随机临床试验在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的西北纪念医疗系统进行。参与者包括2020年4月1日至2023年4月8日期间在30个诊所登记的1614名成年癌症患者或癌症幸存者,并随访12个月直至2024年5月8日。

干预措施

常规护理(UC)包括EHR集成的cPRO评估,或强化护理(EC),后者提供额外的量身定制的基于网络的自我管理计划。

主要结局和测量指标

在基线时以及之后12个月每月收集患者报告结局测量信息系统中关于焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、疼痛干扰和身体功能的测量指标。次要结局包括HCRU指标(住院和/或观察就诊次数和天数、急诊科和/或紧急护理就诊次数以及住院天数)。

结果

共有1614名患者纳入分析,804名随机分配至EC组,810名随机分配至UC组。平均(标准差)年龄为61(13)岁;1095名患者(67.8%)为女性。只有419名EC参与者(52.1%)访问了该网站,其中只有197名(47%)回访;每次访问的中位时间为45秒(四分位间距,45 - 105秒)。在12个月的cPRO结局方面,EC组和UC组之间无统计学显著差异。治疗效果(EC组与UC组)在每个评估时间点相对于基线的平均变化范围为身体功能方面为 -0.19(95%置信区间,-0.86至0.33;P = 0.64),疲劳方面为0.11(95%置信区间,-0.75至0.79;P = 0.87)。零膨胀负二项式和逻辑回归模型显示HCRU结局无显著差异:住院和/或观察就诊(发病率比[IRR],0.90;95%置信区间,0.72 - 1.12)、急诊科和/或紧急护理就诊(IRR,0.99;95%置信区间,0.84 - 1.16)以及住院天数(IRR,1.05;95%置信区间,0.83 - 1.33)。

结论及相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,与单独的cPRO相比,在EHR集成的cPRO中添加基于网络双语自我管理计划并未减轻症状负担或减少HCRU。对基于网络计划的低参与度凸显了需要采取策略来提高参与度,并针对最能受益的人群量身定制干预措施。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03988543。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6395/12053558/b7e0c1835474/jamanetwopen-e258353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6395/12053558/74cca46af8ca/jamanetwopen-e258353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6395/12053558/b7e0c1835474/jamanetwopen-e258353-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6395/12053558/74cca46af8ca/jamanetwopen-e258353-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6395/12053558/b7e0c1835474/jamanetwopen-e258353-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Web-Based Cancer Symptom Self-Management System: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于网络的癌症症状自我管理系统:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e258353. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8353.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
4
Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults.针对成人癌症相关疲劳管理的教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 24;11(11):CD008144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008144.pub2.
5
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
6
Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis.骨关节炎自我管理教育项目
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 15;2014(1):CD008963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008963.pub2.
7
Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施(包括针对病情加重的行动计划)与常规护理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD011682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011682.pub2.
8
Quality of life during usual epilepsy care for anxiety or depression symptoms: Secondary patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of remote assessment methods.常规定期癫痫诊疗中的生活质量:远程评估方法随机试验中的次要患者报告结局评估焦虑或抑郁症状。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Aug;204:107396. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107396. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study on the post-discharge self-management experiences and needs of patients with secondary lymphedema.一项关于继发性淋巴水肿患者出院后自我管理经历与需求的定性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e43557. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043557.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse COVID-19 experiences and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: indirect effects of COVID-19-related depression and financial burden.癌症幸存者的 COVID-19 不良经历和与健康相关的生活质量:与 COVID-19 相关的抑郁和经济负担的间接影响。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 17;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00601-y.
2
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews.数字健康和远程医疗在癌症护理中的应用:系统评价综述。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e316-e327. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00049-3.
3
Implementation and evaluation of an expanded electronic health record-integrated bilingual electronic symptom management program across a multi-site Comprehensive Cancer Center: The NU IMPACT protocol.
多站点综合癌症中心扩展电子病历集成双语电子症状管理方案的实施和评估:NU IMPACT 方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 May;128:107171. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107171. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Telehealth Use Following COVID-19 Within Patient-Sharing Physician Networks at a Rural Comprehensive Cancer Center: Cross-sectional Analysis.农村综合癌症中心患者共享医生网络中COVID-19疫情后的远程医疗使用情况:横断面分析
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Jan 17;9:e42334. doi: 10.2196/42334.
5
Psychological Distress Among Cancer Patients During COVID-19 Pandemic in the World: A Systematic Review.全球新冠疫情期间癌症患者的心理困扰:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 28;12:682154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682154. eCollection 2021.
6
Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic.癌症筛查检测与新冠肺炎疫情期间的癌症诊断。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):458-460. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7600.
7
Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of eRAPID: eHealth Intervention During Chemotherapy.三期随机对照试验 eRAPID:化疗期间的电子健康干预。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):734-747. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02015. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives.数字医疗在肿瘤最佳支持治疗中的应用:效益、限制和未来展望。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4589-4612. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05539-1. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
Impact of Standardized Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Use on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization: Results of a Population-Based Retrospective Matched Cohort Analysis.标准化埃德蒙顿症状评估系统应用对急诊科就诊和住院的影响:基于人群的回顾性匹配队列分析结果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Sep;16(9):e958-e965. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00660. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Implementing electronic health record-integrated screening of patient-reported symptoms and supportive care needs in a comprehensive cancer center.在综合癌症中心实施电子病历整合的患者报告症状和支持性护理需求筛查。
Cancer. 2019 Nov 15;125(22):4059-4068. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32172. Epub 2019 Aug 2.