• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在生长期深覆合患者的两种进餐方案中使用可摘式前牙咬合平面时下颌切牙牙根长度和牙根体积的变化:一项随机临床试验

Mandibular incisor root length and root volume changes using removable anterior bite planes in two mealtime protocols in growing deep bite patients: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Sangwattanarat Thanapat, Thongudomporn Udom

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2025 May 6;95(5):497-503. doi: 10.2319/121824-1034.1.

DOI:10.2319/121824-1034.1
PMID:40324781
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422380/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare mandibular incisor root length (RL) and root volume (RV) changes after 6 months of wearing either a removable anterior bite plane (RABP) during meals (F + M) or not during meals (F - M). Additionally, changes in incisal maximum bite force (IMBF) and their correlation with RL and RV changes were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six children with deep bite using RABPs full time were randomly assigned in equal numbers to either the F + M group or F - M group. Cone-beam computed tomographic radiographs and IMBF were recorded at baseline (CT0) and after 6 months (CT1). Within and between group comparisons of RL and RV were performed (P = .05) with Bonferroni correction applied for segmental RV differences (P = .008). Relationships between IMBF changes and RL and RV changes were analyzed (P = .05).

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant reductions in RL and RV. RL decrease in the F + M group (0.25 ± 0.14 mm) was significantly greater than in the F - M group (0.21 ± 0.14 mm). Reduction in RV was not significantly different between the groups, but IMBF significantly increased in both groups. Significant correlations were observed between IMBF changes and RL (r = 0.56) and RV (r = 0.86) changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep bite correction using RABPs for 6 months with F + M protocol resulted in a greater decrease in mandibular incisor RL compared to the F - M protocol. However, RV changes were comparable between protocols. IMBF may influence the degree of RL and RV changes.

摘要

目的

比较在进餐时佩戴可摘式前牙咬合平面(RABP)(F + M组)和非进餐时佩戴(F - M组)6个月后下颌切牙牙根长度(RL)和牙根体积(RV)的变化。此外,评估切牙最大咬合力(IMBF)的变化及其与RL和RV变化的相关性。

材料与方法

36名全天使用RABP矫治深覆合的儿童被随机等分为F + M组或F - M组。在基线(CT0)和6个月后(CT1)记录锥形束计算机断层扫描影像和IMBF。对RL和RV进行组内和组间比较(P = 0.05),对节段性RV差异采用Bonferroni校正(P = 0.008)。分析IMBF变化与RL和RV变化之间的关系(P = 0.05)。

结果

两组的RL和RV均显著降低。F + M组的RL降低量(0.25±0.14 mm)显著大于F - M组(0.21±0.14 mm)。两组间RV降低量无显著差异,但两组的IMBF均显著增加。IMBF变化与RL变化(r = 0.56)和RV变化(r = 0.86)之间存在显著相关性。

结论

与F - M方案相比,采用F + M方案使用RABP矫治深覆合6个月导致下颌切牙RL的降低幅度更大。然而,两种方案的RV变化相当。IMBF可能影响RL和RV的变化程度。

相似文献

1
Mandibular incisor root length and root volume changes using removable anterior bite planes in two mealtime protocols in growing deep bite patients: a randomized clinical trial.在生长期深覆合患者的两种进餐方案中使用可摘式前牙咬合平面时下颌切牙牙根长度和牙根体积的变化:一项随机临床试验
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 6;95(5):497-503. doi: 10.2319/121824-1034.1.
2
Non-surgical adjunctive interventions for accelerating tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.非手术辅助干预措施在正畸治疗中加速牙齿移动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 20;6(6):CD010887. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010887.pub3.
3
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
4
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
5
Comparing skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of fixed palatal crib and bonded spurs in early management of anterior open bite associated with non-nutritive sucking habits: a randomized clinical trial.比较固定腭托和粘结式阻萌器在早期治疗与非营养性吮吸习惯相关的前牙开牙合中的骨骼和牙槽骨效应:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01086-7.
6
Morphometric Evaluation of Changes in Alveolar Bone and Root Length During Mandibular Incisor Retraction in Class I Bimaxillary Protrusion: A Prospective Study.I类双颌前突患者下颌切牙后移过程中牙槽骨和牙根长度变化的形态计量学评估:一项前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88414. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
Is occlusal contact re-established within 6 months after bonding of a fixed anterior bite plane in adolescents with a Class II division 2 incisor relationship? A randomised controlled trial.对于安氏II类2分类切牙关系的青少年,在粘结固定前牙咬合平面后的6个月内,咬合接触能否重新建立?一项随机对照试验。
J Orthod. 2025 Jun;52(2):115-132. doi: 10.1177/14653125241277832. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Effect of Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation on External Apical Root Resorption and Periodontal Indices Following En-Masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.低强度电刺激对年轻成年人上前牙整体后移后根尖外吸收及牙周指数的影响:一项随机对照试验
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70188. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70188.
9
Three-dimensional retrospective analysis of root resorption and incisive canal changes following maxillary incisor retraction in class I and class II extraction cases: a comparison of clear aligners and fixed appliances.I类和II类拔牙病例中上颌前牙内收后牙根吸收和切牙管变化的三维回顾性分析:透明矫治器与固定矫治器的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10210-y.
10
Evaluation of Buccal Bone Thickness and Root Length of Maxillary Incisors in Deep Bite Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估深覆合患者上颌切牙的颊侧骨厚度和牙根长度
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Oct;11(5):e70207. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70207.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of removable anterior bite planes with varied mealtime protocols in correcting deep bites among growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.不同进食用餐方案的可摘前牙颌垫治疗生长发育期深覆合患者的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Nov 1;94(6):615-622. doi: 10.2319/022124-129.1.
2
Estimation of Maximum Occlusal Bite Force of School-going Children in Different Dentition: A Cross-sectional Study.不同牙列状态下学龄儿童最大咬合咬合力的评估:一项横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):804-809. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2718.
3
Psychological Stress as a Determinant of Increased Maximum Voluntary Bite Force - A Clinical Observational Study.心理压力作为最大自主咬合力增加的决定因素——一项临床观察研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):e46106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46106. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
The effects of anterior bite plane on temporomandibular joint and mandibular morphology.前牙咬合板对颞下颌关节及下颌形态的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):720-726. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Mandibular incisor root volume changes between anterior bite planes fabricated from acrylic resin and thermoplastic materials: a prospective randomized clinical trial.使用丙烯酸树脂和热塑材料制作的前牙颌垫对下颌切牙牙根体积的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):755-763. doi: 10.2319/021622-141.1.
6
Effects of anterior bite planes fabricated from acrylic resin and thermoplastic material on masticatory muscle responses and maximum bite force in children with a deep bite: A 6-month randomised controlled trial.树脂基和热塑基前牙咬板对深覆儿童咀嚼肌反应和最大咬合力的影响:一项为期 6 个月的随机对照试验。
J Oral Rehabil. 2022 Oct;49(10):980-992. doi: 10.1111/joor.13351. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review of the literature.根管治疗中的锥形束计算机断层扫描——文献综述。
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1138-1152. doi: 10.1111/iej.13115. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Effect of continuous versus intermittent orthodontic forces on root resorption: A microcomputed tomography study.持续与间歇正畸力对牙根吸收的影响:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):733-739. doi: 10.2319/012518-68.1. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Dentoskeletal modifications in Class II deep bite malocclusion treatment with anterior bite plane functional appliance.使用前牙咬合平面功能矫治器治疗安氏II类深覆合错牙合时的牙颌面改变
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e1029-e1034. doi: 10.4317/jced.54092. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
Maximum bite force analysis in different age groups.不同年龄组的最大咬合力分析。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;18(3):272-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1374647. Epub 2014 Apr 24.