• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加纳参加国家医疗保险计划的高血压和糖尿病患者在经认可的医疗机构接受治疗时失访的决定因素。

Determinants of lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) among National Health Insurance Scheme-insured hypertension and diabetes patients attending accredited health facilities in Ghana.

作者信息

Nketiah-Amponsah Edward, Ahimah-Agyakwah Solomon, Alhassan Robert Kaba, Sunkwa-Mills Gifty, Gómez-Pérez G P, van Andel Judith, Attachey Alex Yao Israel, Opoku-Boateng Yaw Nyarko, Addo-Cobbiah Vivian, Okoe-Boye Bernard, de Wit Tobias Floris Rinke, Antwi Maxwell Akwasi

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

Centre for Health Policy and Implementation Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.

出版信息

Trop Med Health. 2025 May 6;53(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00743-3.

DOI:10.1186/s41182-025-00743-3
PMID:40325488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054282/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HPT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in Ghana. A key challenge in managing these conditions is non-adherence to follow-up visits, commonly referred to as "lost- to- follow-up" (LTFU). Data from the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) between 2017 and 2019 revealed that 37% (232,442/634,981) of patients were LTFU at NHIA-accredited health facilities. This study aimed to investigate the factors driving this high LTFU rate in Ghana.

METHODS

A total of 480 hypertensive and diabetic patients, randomly selected from the NHIA electronic claims database from facilities in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions between 2019 and 2020, were interviewed. Participants were divided into two groups: LTFU, which consisted of only one visit (351, 73%), and follow-up (FU), which consisted of more than one visit (129, 27%). The sample included patients diagnosed with hypertension only (308, 64%), diabetes only (45, 9%), and both hypertension and diabetes (127, 26%).

RESULTS

No statistically significant socioeconomic differences were observed between the LTFU and FU groups, except in their adherence to follow-up visits. The likelihood of LTFU was higher among patients without follow-up awareness (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.05-4.83), those who felt stigmatized (OR = 15.51, 95% CI: 1.01-238.90), those who attended facilities where physicians were available only some of the time (OR = 7.37, 95% CI: 1.07-50.61), those attending facilities without the necessary diagnostic equipment, those who described the NHIS coverage for DM diagnostic tests as inadequate, and those receiving traditional or herbal treatments (OR = 16.90, 95% CI: 3.12-91.45). Conversely, patients from the Ashanti Region (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96), those educated on diagnostic procedures (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08-0.98), and those whose treatment was not under control (OR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00-0.69) were less likely to be LTFU. Additionally, patients diagnosed more than ten years ago (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.79) and those who were neutral about establishing support groups were less likely to be LTFU.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that lack of follow-up awareness, stigmatization, and preference for traditional or herbal treatments are key drivers of lost-to-follow-up behavior among hypertension and diabetes patients. Thus, remedial policies should include increasing patient education on the importance of follow-up visits, ensuring the availability of essential medications, diagnostic equipment, and physicians, expanding the NHIA financial coverage, and integrating traditional medicine into standard healthcare to improve treatment adherence and reduce LTFU rates.

摘要

背景

高血压(HPT)和糖尿病(DM)是加纳发病和死亡的主要原因。管理这些疾病的一个关键挑战是不遵守随访预约,通常称为“失访”(LTFU)。国家健康保险管理局(NHIA)2017年至2019年的数据显示,在NHIA认可的医疗机构中,37%(232,442/634,981)的患者失访。本研究旨在调查导致加纳如此高失访率的因素。

方法

从2019年至2020年大阿克拉和阿散蒂地区医疗机构的NHIA电子索赔数据库中随机选取480名高血压和糖尿病患者进行访谈。参与者分为两组:失访组,仅就诊一次(351人,73%);随访组,就诊次数超过一次(129人,27%)。样本包括仅被诊断为高血压的患者(308人,64%)、仅患糖尿病的患者(45人,9%)以及同时患有高血压和糖尿病的患者(127人,26%)。

结果

除了在遵守随访预约方面,失访组和随访组之间未观察到具有统计学意义的社会经济差异。在没有随访意识的患者中失访的可能性更高(比值比[OR]=2.5,95%置信区间[CI]:1.05 - 4.83),感到受辱的患者(OR = 15.51,95% CI:1.01 - 238.90),就诊的医疗机构医生仅在某些时间坐诊的患者(OR = 7.37,95% CI:1.07 - 50.61),就诊的医疗机构没有必要诊断设备的患者,认为NHIS对糖尿病诊断检查覆盖不足的患者,以及接受传统或草药治疗的患者(OR = 16.90,95% CI:3.12 - 91.45)。相反,来自阿散蒂地区的患者(OR = 0.58,95% CI:0.35 - 0.96)、接受过诊断程序教育的患者(OR = 0.28,95% CI:0.08 - 0.98)以及治疗未得到控制的患者(OR = 0.04,95% CI:0.00 - 0.69)失访的可能性较小。此外,十年前以上被诊断的患者(OR = 0.44,95% CI:0.24 - 0.79)以及对建立支持小组持中立态度的患者失访的可能性较小。

结论

该研究发现,缺乏随访意识、受辱感以及对传统或草药治疗的偏好是高血压和糖尿病患者失访行为的关键驱动因素。因此,补救政策应包括加强患者对随访重要性的教育,确保基本药物、诊断设备和医生的可及性,扩大NHIA的财务覆盖范围,以及将传统医学纳入标准医疗保健以提高治疗依从性并降低失访率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25a/12054282/b987793781fd/41182_2025_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25a/12054282/b987793781fd/41182_2025_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e25a/12054282/b987793781fd/41182_2025_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Determinants of lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) among National Health Insurance Scheme-insured hypertension and diabetes patients attending accredited health facilities in Ghana.加纳参加国家医疗保险计划的高血压和糖尿病患者在经认可的医疗机构接受治疗时失访的决定因素。
Trop Med Health. 2025 May 6;53(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00743-3.
2
Insured clients out-of-pocket payments for health care under the national health insurance scheme in Ghana.加纳国家医疗保险计划下参保客户的医疗自付费用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 8;21(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06401-8.
3
Factors That Influence Enrolment and Retention in Ghana' National Health Insurance Scheme.影响加纳国家健康保险计划参保和续保的因素。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 May 1;7(5):443-454. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.117.
4
Does the operations of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana align with the goals of Primary Health Care? Perspectives of key stakeholders in northern Ghana.加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的运作是否符合初级卫生保健的目标?加纳北部主要利益相关者的观点。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0096-9.
5
Predictors of loss to follow up among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending a private not for profit urban diabetes clinic in Uganda - a descriptive retrospective study.乌干达一家私立非营利性城市糖尿病诊所 2 型糖尿病患者随访丢失的预测因素——一项描述性回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 23;19(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4415-4.
6
What alternative and innovative domestic methods of healthcare financing can be explored to fix the current claims reimbursement challenges by the National Health Insurance Scheme of Ghana? Perspectives of health managers.为解决加纳国家健康保险计划目前在理赔报销方面的挑战,可以探索哪些替代性和创新性的国内医疗保健融资方法?卫生管理人员的观点。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Oct 9;19(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00323-2.
7
Does the operations of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Ghana align with the goals of Primary Health Care? Perspectives of key stakeholders in northern Ghana.加纳国家健康保险计划(NHIS)的运作是否符合初级卫生保健的目标?加纳北部关键利益相关者的观点。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Sep 5;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0095-x.
8
Social capital and active membership in the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme - a mixed method study.社会资本与加纳国家健康保险计划的积极参保——一项混合方法研究
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 2;14:118. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0239-y.
9
Identifying risk factors for loss to follow-up in adults living with HIV in a high-burden district in Ghana.确定加纳一个高负担地区感染艾滋病毒的成年人失访的风险因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22254-w.
10
Liberia adherence and loss-to-follow-up in HIV and AIDS care and treatment: A retrospective cohort of adolescents and adults from 2016-2019.利比里亚艾滋病毒和艾滋病护理与治疗中的依从性及失访情况:2016年至2019年青少年及成人回顾性队列研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;2(3):e0000198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000198. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural-urban difference in the prevalence of hypertension in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西非城乡高血压患病率的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hum Hypertens. 2024 Apr;38(4):352-364. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00688-8. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
2
Barriers to Follow Up Care in the South Asian Immigrant Population at High Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome at Elmhurst Hospital Center.埃尔姆赫斯特医院中心高危急性冠状动脉综合征南亚裔移民人群随访障碍。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Dec;24(6):1543-1549. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01353-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
Rural-urban variation in hypertension among women in Ghana: insights from a national survey.
加纳女性中城乡高血压的差异:一项全国性调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;21(1):2150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12204-7.
4
Lost to follow-up in the Norwegian mother, father and child cohort study.在挪威母婴队列研究中失访。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;36(2):300-309. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12821. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
5
Characteristics of people with dementia lost to follow-up from a dementia care center.痴呆症患者从痴呆症护理中心失访的特征。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5628. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
Management of chronic non-communicable diseases in Ghana: a qualitative study using the chronic care model.加纳慢性非传染性疾病的管理:一项运用慢性病护理模型的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;21(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11170-4.
7
High incidence of patients lost to follow-up after venous thromboembolism diagnosis - Identifying an unmet need for targeted transition of care.静脉血栓栓塞症诊断后患者失访率高——确定针对性护理过渡方面未满足的需求。
Vascular. 2022 Jun;30(3):548-554. doi: 10.1177/17085381211020969. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Economic Factors as Major Determinants of Ustekinumab Drug Survival of Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Korea.经济因素是韩国慢性斑块状银屑病患者优特克单抗药物留存率的主要决定因素。
Ann Dermatol. 2018 Dec;30(6):668-675. doi: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.6.668. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
9
Predictors of lost to follow up from antiretroviral therapy among adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区成人抗逆转录病毒治疗中失访的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Mar 20;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00822-7.
10
Risk factors associated with loss to follow-up of breast cancer patients: A retrospective analysis.与乳腺癌患者失访相关的风险因素:一项回顾性分析。
Breast. 2021 Jun;57:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 2.