Volpato Eleonora, Poletti Valentina, Banfi Paolo, Bonanomi Andrea, Pagnini Francesco
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70285. doi: 10.1111/hex.70285.
After receiving a diagnosis, individuals often develop expectations about how their condition will evolve. This cognitive framework, known as 'Illness Expectations' (IEs), encompasses future-oriented beliefs regarding the course of the illness and its symptoms. In chronic conditions such as asthma, IEs may play a critical role in shaping patient-reported outcomes and clinical markers of disease progression. This study aims to empirically evaluate the impact of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function.
A cohort of 310 individuals diagnosed with asthma was followed over a 6-month period, with three assessment points. Asthma control was measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), while respiratory function was evaluated through forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) using spirometry. IEs were assessed using the validated 'Illness Expectation Test' (IET), which captures both explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) expectations. Predictive analyses were conducted using latent growth modelling and linear regression to examine the influence of IEs on asthma symptoms and respiratory function over time.
People with more negative explicit IEs about their asthma reported worse symptoms over time (β = -0.50, SE = 0.21, p = 0.01). Implicit IEs were not statistically significant (β = -0.014, SE = 0.008, p = 0.09). Explicit IEs about symptom progression were also associated with changes in lung function, with more negative expectations predicting greater declines in respiratory performance (β = 0.51, SE = 0.11, p = 0.001).
These findings suggest that IEs may be meaningfully associated with asthma outcomes, highlighting their potential relevance in understanding patient experiences and symptom perception. These results support further research into interventions targeting cognitive frameworks, with the aim of informing more personalised, patient-centred approaches to asthma management.
This study was developed in response to patient-reported challenges in asthma management, particularly around understanding and managing IEs. Patients contributed to identifying key areas of concern, and their perspectives informed the choice of outcomes and tools. While direct involvement in recruitment and dissemination was limited due to the pandemic, the study's design and focus were guided by patient priorities, with potential applications in clinical consultations and future co-designed interventions.
在被诊断出病情后,个体通常会对自身病情的发展形成预期。这种认知框架被称为“疾病预期”(IEs),它包含了对疾病进程及其症状的面向未来的信念。在哮喘等慢性病中,疾病预期可能在塑造患者报告的结果和疾病进展的临床指标方面发挥关键作用。本研究旨在实证评估疾病预期对哮喘症状和呼吸功能的影响。
对310名被诊断为哮喘的个体进行了为期6个月的队列研究,设有三个评估点。使用哮喘控制测试(ACT)来衡量哮喘控制情况,同时通过肺活量测定法测量1秒用力呼气量(FEV)来评估呼吸功能。使用经过验证的“疾病预期测试”(IET)来评估疾病预期,该测试可以捕捉明确(有意识)和隐含(无意识)的预期。使用潜在增长模型和线性回归进行预测分析,以研究疾病预期随时间对哮喘症状和呼吸功能的影响。
对哮喘有更多负面明确疾病预期的人随着时间推移报告的症状更严重(β = -0.50,标准误 = 0.21,p = 0.01)。隐含疾病预期无统计学意义(β = -0.014,标准误 = 0.008,p = 0.09)。关于症状进展的明确疾病预期也与肺功能变化相关,负面预期越多,预测呼吸功能下降幅度越大(β = 0.51,标准误 = 0.11,p = 0.001)。
这些发现表明,疾病预期可能与哮喘结果存在有意义的关联,突出了它们在理解患者经历和症状感知方面的潜在相关性。这些结果支持进一步研究针对认知框架的干预措施,旨在为哮喘管理提供更个性化、以患者为中心的方法。
本研究是针对患者报告的哮喘管理挑战而开展的,特别是在理解和管理疾病预期方面。患者参与确定了关键关注领域,他们的观点为结果和工具的选择提供了信息。尽管由于疫情,患者直接参与招募和传播的程度有限,但该研究的设计和重点是以患者的优先事项为指导的,在临床咨询和未来共同设计的干预措施中具有潜在应用价值。