Suppr超能文献

解读胫骨平台骨折分类:系统评价中一个世纪的个体化见解

Decoding tibial plateau fracture classifications: a century of individualized insights in a systematic review.

作者信息

Vosoughi Fardis, Menbari Oskouie Iman, Rahimdoost Nazanin, Pesantez Rodrigo

出版信息

EFORT Open Rev. 2025 May 5;10(5):316-326. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2024-0184.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review of all proposed classifications of tibial plateau fractures (TPFs) to facilitate comparison and identify the most effective reduction methods.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all the articles involving the suggestion of a new method of TPF classification. The descriptions of classifications, along with their suggested management strategies, were recorded.

RESULTS

Out of the 2,712 identified records, 69 were included in the study. Schatzker's and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classifications were the most frequently mentioned in the literature. The concept of a 'column' and posterior column fractures were introduced in 2010. Following this, posterior plateau fractures were further divided into posteromedial and posterolateral fractures. Proposed treatment approaches in most studies were based on the involved region and degree of displacement, while others considered fracture plane, deformity direction and type of fracture. The latest developments include the subclassification of the posterolateral column and consideration of associated injuries to the fibular head, eminentia, extensor mechanism and mechanical derangements along with the concept of the main deformity direction.

CONCLUSION

The understanding of TPF patterns, associated injuries, surgical approaches and fixation methods has evolved in a compelling stepwise manner. Currently, there is no gold standard classification that addresses fracture configuration, soft-tissue injuries, principal direction of deformity, central eminence avulsions, extensor mechanism disruptions and mechanical derangements, while maintaining a simple and reliable categorization. Therefore, employing individualized classification systems remains the most logical approach at present. This study offers invaluable assistance in this regard.

摘要

目的

我们对所有提出的胫骨平台骨折(TPF)分类进行了系统评价,以方便比较并确定最有效的复位方法。

方法

在PubMed、Scopus、Embase、科学网和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索所有涉及TPF新分类方法建议的文章。记录分类描述及其建议的治疗策略。

结果

在2712条检索到的记录中,69条被纳入研究。Schatzker分类法和骨科学术协会/骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类法是文献中最常被提及的。2010年引入了“柱”和后柱骨折的概念。此后,后平台骨折进一步分为后内侧和后外侧骨折。大多数研究中提出的治疗方法基于受累区域和移位程度,而其他研究则考虑骨折平面、畸形方向和骨折类型。最新进展包括后外侧柱的亚分类以及对腓骨头、隆突、伸肌机制和机械紊乱相关损伤的考虑,以及主要畸形方向的概念。

结论

对TPF模式、相关损伤、手术入路和固定方法的理解以令人信服的逐步方式不断发展。目前,尚无一种金标准分类能够在保持简单可靠分类的同时,涵盖骨折形态、软组织损伤、主要畸形方向、中央隆突撕脱、伸肌机制破坏和机械紊乱。因此,目前采用个体化分类系统仍然是最合理的方法。本研究在这方面提供了宝贵的帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3da/12061015/e49366c2a49b/EOR-2024-0184fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验