Zillmann Hans
Seminar für Philosophie, Universität Erfurt, Alfred-Weber-Platz 4, 99089, Erfurt, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jun;68(6):631-637. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04056-y. Epub 2025 May 6.
The antibiotics crisis is increasing interest in bacteriophages and related therapeutic approaches. The translation of phage therapy into clinical application faces various ethical challenges. These include the patient's informed consent based on patient information as well as open questions regarding an ethically sound study design. In addition, further ethical problems arise from the current situation of phage therapy in Germany with regard to equity of access. This article reflects on the three aspects of phage therapy mentioned above. The results show that phage therapy does not pose any requirements for patient information that could not be solved by adapting the information provided. Questions regarding an adapted study design arise against the background of the placebo dilemma, possible resistance to antibiotics and the expected small number of study participants. An attempt can be made to respond to these challenges by adapting the study design. As a result, the studies deviate from the gold standard, which is randomized, controlled and double-blind studies. A balance must be struck here between evidence requirements and the protection of study participants. From an ethical point of view, the protection of participants must be given greater weight. The current situation of phage therapy in Germany poses an ethical problem, as both the individualised therapeutic trial and the resulting medical tourism that can be observed stand in the way of the demand for fair access and distribution. In order to overcome this status, the magistral prescription represents a possible interim step until clarity has been gained about an appropriate study design.
抗生素危机正使人们对噬菌体及相关治疗方法的兴趣日益增加。将噬菌体疗法转化为临床应用面临着各种伦理挑战。这些挑战包括基于患者信息的患者知情同意,以及关于符合伦理道德的研究设计的诸多悬而未决的问题。此外,德国目前噬菌体疗法在获取公平性方面的现状引发了更多伦理问题。本文对上述噬菌体疗法的三个方面进行了思考。结果表明,噬菌体疗法对患者信息并无任何无法通过调整所提供信息来解决的要求。关于适应性研究设计的问题是在安慰剂困境、可能存在的抗生素耐药性以及预期的少量研究参与者的背景下产生的。可以尝试通过调整研究设计来应对这些挑战。结果,这些研究偏离了随机、对照和双盲研究这一黄金标准。在此必须在证据要求和保护研究参与者之间取得平衡。从伦理角度来看,必须更加重视对参与者的保护。德国目前噬菌体疗法的现状带来了一个伦理问题,因为个体化治疗试验以及由此出现的医疗旅游现象,都阻碍了公平获取和分配的需求。为了克服这种状况,在明确合适的研究设计之前,单方配药代表了一种可能的过渡措施。