Fei Shuo
School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing City, China.
PLoS One. 2025 May 6;20(5):e0323125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323125. eCollection 2025.
This paper investigates the implementation of personalised support under Universal Credit (UC) from both administrative and claimant perspectives, based on qualitative interviews conducted across two South London case study sites. While UC is designed to promote labour market participation and simplify welfare delivery, claimants encounter multiple barriers-including digital exclusion, limited access to affordable childcare, and inconsistencies in support provision. Parents with care responsibilities face heightened pressures due to tightened work requirements and upfront childcare costs, which are often regarded as limiting their ability to comply with conditionality. Local frontline staff navigate institutional pressures from multiple governance levels within a context of resource constraints, applying discretion to tailor support to individual needs. However, this discretion may result in variable practices and uneven outcomes across different service settings. The findings underscore the tensions between the policy goal of responsibilising individuals and the complex realities of claimants' lives.
本文基于在伦敦南部两个案例研究地点进行的定性访谈,从行政和申领者的角度调查了普遍信贷(UC)下个性化支持的实施情况。虽然普遍信贷旨在促进劳动力市场参与并简化福利发放,但申领者面临多种障碍,包括数字排斥、难以获得负担得起的儿童保育服务以及支持提供方面的不一致。有照料责任的父母由于工作要求收紧和前期儿童保育成本而面临更大压力,这些成本通常被认为限制了他们遵守条件性要求的能力。当地一线工作人员在资源有限的情况下应对来自多个治理层面的机构压力,运用自由裁量权根据个人需求调整支持。然而,这种自由裁量权可能导致不同服务环境中的做法各异和结果不均。研究结果凸显了让个人承担责任的政策目标与申领者生活的复杂现实之间的矛盾。