• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性患者的人工智能与结直肠癌检测性能:荟萃分析与系统评价

Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review.

作者信息

Spadaccini Marco, Hassan Cesare, Mori Yuichi, Halvorsen Natalie, Gimeno-García Antonio Z, Nakashima Hirotaka, Facciorusso Antonio, Patel Harsh K, Antonelli Giulio, Khalaf Kareem, Rizkala Tommy, Ramai Daryl, Rondonotti Emanuele, Kamba Shunsuke, Maselli Roberta, Correale Loredana, Bretthauer Michael, Bhandari Pradeep, Sharma Prateek, Rex Douglas K, Repici Alessandro

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2025 Aug;37(8):815-823. doi: 10.1111/den.15034. Epub 2025 May 6.

DOI:10.1111/den.15034
PMID:
40328639
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The combination of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by colonoscopy has established itself as one of the preferred population-based screening strategies. Despite extensive exploration of various techniques and technologies, their impact on adenoma detection rate has shown inconsistency across studies in this specific setting "FIT+ population." We aimed to assess the impact of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system in all randomized trials focused on this subpopulation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until September 2023 for randomized controlled trials reporting diagnostic accuracy of CADe systems for detection of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was pooled adenoma detection rate, and secondary outcomes were adenoma per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma per colonoscopy, serrated lesions, and nonneoplastic per colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Ten randomized trials on 5421 patients were included. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.62 vs. 0.52; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31). CADe also resulted in higher detection performances of both adenomas (incidence rate ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.24) and serrated lesions (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.38) at per-polyp analysis. No differences were found for advanced adenomas between the groups. On the other hand, more nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.45 vs. 0.34; mean difference 0.06; P = 0.026) in a comparable inspection time.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CADe during colonoscopy results in an increased detection of adenomas, and serrated lesions, in a FIT+ setting. The impact on advanced adenomas was not significant. Higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps were also reported.

摘要

目的

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)联合结肠镜检查已成为基于人群的首选筛查策略之一。尽管对各种技术进行了广泛探索,但在“FIT+人群”这一特定背景下,不同研究中这些技术对腺瘤检出率的影响并不一致。我们旨在评估计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统在所有针对该亚人群的随机试验中的影响。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Scopus数据库,直至2023年9月,以查找报告CADe系统检测结直肠肿瘤诊断准确性的随机对照试验。主要结局是汇总腺瘤检出率,次要结局是每次结肠镜检查的腺瘤、每次结肠镜检查的高级别腺瘤、锯齿状病变以及每次结肠镜检查的非肿瘤性病变。

结果

纳入了针对5421例患者的10项随机试验。CADe组的腺瘤检出率高于标准结肠镜检查组(0.62对0.52;相对风险1.19;95%置信区间1.08 - 1.31)。在每息肉分析中,CADe对腺瘤(发病率比1.16;95%置信区间1.09 - 1.24)和锯齿状病变(发病率比1.20;95%置信区间1.05 - 1.38)的检测性能也更高。两组之间高级别腺瘤未发现差异。另一方面,在可比的检查时间内,CADe组切除的非肿瘤性息肉比标准组更多(0.45对0.34;平均差异0.06;P = 0.026)。

结论

在结肠镜检查期间使用CADe可提高FIT+背景下腺瘤和锯齿状病变的检出率。对高级别腺瘤的影响不显著。也有报道称非肿瘤性息肉的不必要切除率更高。

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence and colorectal neoplasia detection performances in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test: Meta-analysis and systematic review.粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性患者的人工智能与结直肠癌检测性能:荟萃分析与系统评价
Dig Endosc. 2025 Aug;37(8):815-823. doi: 10.1111/den.15034. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Computer-aided detection versus advanced imaging for detection of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机辅助检测与高级成像在结直肠肿瘤检测中的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;6(10):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00215-6. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia During Colonoscopy : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.实时计算机辅助检测结肠镜检查中的结直肠肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Sep;176(9):1209-1220. doi: 10.7326/M22-3678. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial.基于 GI Genius 人工智能内镜模块的结肠镜辅助下息肉检测与常规结肠镜检查比较(COLO-DETECT):一项多中心、开放标签、平行臂、实用随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;9(10):911-923. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00161-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
6
Evaluation of Computer-Aided Detection During Colonoscopy in the Community (AI-SEE): A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.社区结肠镜检查中的计算机辅助检测评估(AI-SEE):一项多中心随机临床试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1841-1847. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002239. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能用于减少结肠镜检查中腺瘤和息肉的漏诊:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 7;31(21):105753. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.105753.
8
Linked color imaging versus conventional white-light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.联合彩色成像与传统白光结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 19;8(8):CD015476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015476.pub2.
9
Lack of Effectiveness of Computer Aided Detection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.计算机辅助检测对结直肠肿瘤的有效性缺失:非随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;22(5):971-980.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.029. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
10
The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design.多靶点粪便免疫化学试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查项目:一项具有配对设计的横断面干预研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1299. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10372-2.