Spadaccini Marco, Hassan Cesare, Mori Yuichi, Halvorsen Natalie, Gimeno-García Antonio Z, Nakashima Hirotaka, Facciorusso Antonio, Patel Harsh K, Antonelli Giulio, Khalaf Kareem, Rizkala Tommy, Ramai Daryl, Rondonotti Emanuele, Kamba Shunsuke, Maselli Roberta, Correale Loredana, Bretthauer Michael, Bhandari Pradeep, Sharma Prateek, Rex Douglas K, Repici Alessandro
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.
Dig Endosc. 2025 Aug;37(8):815-823. doi: 10.1111/den.15034. Epub 2025 May 6.
The combination of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) followed by colonoscopy has established itself as one of the preferred population-based screening strategies. Despite extensive exploration of various techniques and technologies, their impact on adenoma detection rate has shown inconsistency across studies in this specific setting "FIT+ population." We aimed to assess the impact of the computer-aided detection (CADe) system in all randomized trials focused on this subpopulation.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until September 2023 for randomized controlled trials reporting diagnostic accuracy of CADe systems for detection of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was pooled adenoma detection rate, and secondary outcomes were adenoma per colonoscopy, advanced adenoma per colonoscopy, serrated lesions, and nonneoplastic per colonoscopy.
Ten randomized trials on 5421 patients were included. Adenoma detection rate was higher in the CADe group than in the standard colonoscopy group (0.62 vs. 0.52; relative risk 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.31). CADe also resulted in higher detection performances of both adenomas (incidence rate ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.24) and serrated lesions (incidence rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.38) at per-polyp analysis. No differences were found for advanced adenomas between the groups. On the other hand, more nonneoplastic polyps were removed in the CADe than the standard group (0.45 vs. 0.34; mean difference 0.06; P = 0.026) in a comparable inspection time.
The use of CADe during colonoscopy results in an increased detection of adenomas, and serrated lesions, in a FIT+ setting. The impact on advanced adenomas was not significant. Higher rates of unnecessary removal of nonneoplastic polyps were also reported.
粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)联合结肠镜检查已成为基于人群的首选筛查策略之一。尽管对各种技术进行了广泛探索,但在“FIT+人群”这一特定背景下,不同研究中这些技术对腺瘤检出率的影响并不一致。我们旨在评估计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统在所有针对该亚人群的随机试验中的影响。
我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Scopus数据库,直至2023年9月,以查找报告CADe系统检测结直肠肿瘤诊断准确性的随机对照试验。主要结局是汇总腺瘤检出率,次要结局是每次结肠镜检查的腺瘤、每次结肠镜检查的高级别腺瘤、锯齿状病变以及每次结肠镜检查的非肿瘤性病变。
纳入了针对5421例患者的10项随机试验。CADe组的腺瘤检出率高于标准结肠镜检查组(0.62对0.52;相对风险1.19;95%置信区间1.08 - 1.31)。在每息肉分析中,CADe对腺瘤(发病率比1.16;95%置信区间1.09 - 1.24)和锯齿状病变(发病率比1.20;95%置信区间1.05 - 1.38)的检测性能也更高。两组之间高级别腺瘤未发现差异。另一方面,在可比的检查时间内,CADe组切除的非肿瘤性息肉比标准组更多(0.45对0.34;平均差异0.06;P = 0.026)。
在结肠镜检查期间使用CADe可提高FIT+背景下腺瘤和锯齿状病变的检出率。对高级别腺瘤的影响不显著。也有报道称非肿瘤性息肉的不必要切除率更高。