Zamora Danniel, Xie Hu, Wong Elizabeth, Santiano Clarissa, Vivas-Jimenez Andrea, Sadowska-Klasa Alicja, Kampouri Eleftheria, Stevens-Ayers Terry, Ueda Oshima Masumi, Leisenring Wendy M, Hill Joshua A, Boeckh Michael
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1038/s41409-025-02611-4.
We examined cytomegalovirus-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) to pp65 and IE-1 at 100 days after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis using ELISPOT (T-SPOT®.CMV, Oxford-Immunotec, Abingdon, UK). We compared ELISPOT results to a laboratory-developed intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay and characterized thresholds for the prediction of late clinically significant (cs)CMV infection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. We identified factors associated with high (i.e., at or above threshold) CMV-CMI to both antigens. ELISPOT correlated well with polyfunctional CMV-specific T-cell immunity by ICS. We defined thresholds of 67 and 4 spots per 250,000 cells for pp65 and IE-1, respectively, for predicting late csCMV infection. PBSC graft source, CMV seropositive donor, and/or CMV reactivation in the first 100 days post-HCT were associated with high CMV-CMI to pp65 and/or IE-1. Patients with high CMV-CMI to both antigens at day 100 had a lower incidence of late csCMV infection, however, late changes in immunosuppression affected risk prediction. Clinical risk factors (e.g., early CMV infection, acute graft-versus-host disease) predicted late csCMV and improved the predictive value of CMV-CMI testing. Thus, standardized CMV-CMI, after HCT, combined with clinical factors can be used to accurately stratify the risk of late csCMV infection after letermovir prophylaxis.
在停用来特莫韦预防措施后,于造血细胞移植(HCT)100天时,我们使用酶联免疫斑点法(T-SPOT®.CMV,牛津免疫技术公司,英国阿宾顿)检测了针对pp65和IE-1的巨细胞病毒特异性细胞介导免疫(CMV-CMI)。我们将酶联免疫斑点法的结果与实验室自行开发的细胞内细胞因子染色(ICS)检测进行比较,并通过受试者操作特征分析确定预测晚期临床显著(cs)巨细胞病毒感染的阈值。我们确定了与针对两种抗原的高(即达到或高于阈值)CMV-CMI相关的因素。酶联免疫斑点法与通过细胞内细胞因子染色检测的多功能巨细胞病毒特异性T细胞免疫相关性良好。我们分别定义每250,000个细胞中pp65和IE-1的斑点数阈值为67和4个,用于预测晚期cs巨细胞病毒感染。外周血干细胞移植来源、巨细胞病毒血清学阳性供体和/或造血细胞移植后前100天内的巨细胞病毒再激活与针对pp65和/或IE-1的高CMV-CMI相关。在第100天时针对两种抗原均具有高CMV-CMI的患者晚期cs巨细胞病毒感染发生率较低,然而,免疫抑制的后期变化影响风险预测。临床风险因素(如早期巨细胞病毒感染、急性移植物抗宿主病)可预测晚期cs巨细胞病毒感染,并提高CMV-CMI检测的预测价值。因此,造血细胞移植后标准化的CMV-CMI,结合临床因素,可用于准确分层来特莫韦预防后晚期cs巨细胞病毒感染的风险。