• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统全膝关节置换术与主动机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的炎症标志物及其他变量

Inflammatory markers in conventional vs. active robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and other variables.

作者信息

Punit Abhinandan S, Sangani Karthik, Prashanth B N, Ismail Ihjas, Kumar S Satish

机构信息

Narayana Healthcity Hospital, Bengaluru, 560099, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 6;26(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08585-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08585-0
PMID:40329267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054132/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty (CTKA) has long been the standard for arthroplasty. Recent technological advancements have introduced Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (RATKA) and its more automated versions, such as active RATKA offering enhanced precision, accuracy, and potentially superior outcomes. Their role in inflammatory markers has been sparsely explored. Inflammatory response has a direct effect on functional recovery following joint replacement. Our study aimed to understand the natural progression of these inflammatory markers post-surgery. It compared the inflammatory response of CTKA and active RATKA to identify their differences. It also evaluated the role of comorbidities, gender, tourniquet usage, and unilateral or bilateral surgery on inflammatory markers.

METHODS

CRP, IL6, ESR, and TLC were measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 2 (POD2), POD14, and POD30 in 192 consecutive cases of TKA.

RESULTS

CRP increased from 6.59 mg/ml(SD 4.92) preop to 190.57 mg/ml(SD 77.62) on POD2, then decreased to 53.55 mg/ml(SD 42.3) on POD14 and 16.72 mg/ml(SD 14.04) by POD30(p-0.001). ESR rose from 18.81 mm/hr(SD 7.17) preop to 62.78 mm/hr(SD 34.41) on POD2, with a decrease to 57.05 mm/hr(SD 26.63) on POD14 and 27.18 mm/hr(SD 22.42) by POD30(p-0.001). IL6 was markedly elevated at 163.60pg/ml(SD 51.05) on POD2 compared to 6.55pg/ml(SD 2.58) preop(p-0.001). The RATKA group had lower CRP, ESR, and TLC levels than CTKA (p < 0.05). Diabetes Mellitus was associated with increased inflammation (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RATKA cases showed a lower inflammatory response in several markers and slightly better pain scores compared to the conventional approach. Factors such as tourniquet usage and patient gender did not significantly impact inflammatory markers. Among the comorbidities, Diabetes Mellitus increased inflammation. In the majority of the normal patients, the inflammatory markers did not return to the normal reference even 1 month post-surgery. This physiological variation should be considered when assessing for potential prosthetic joint infections.

摘要

背景

传统全膝关节置换术(CTKA)长期以来一直是关节置换术的标准术式。最近的技术进步引入了机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RATKA)及其更自动化的版本,如主动式RATKA,其具有更高的精度、准确性,并可能带来更优的手术效果。它们在炎症标志物方面的作用鲜有研究。炎症反应对关节置换术后的功能恢复有直接影响。我们的研究旨在了解这些炎症标志物术后的自然变化过程。比较CTKA和主动式RATKA的炎症反应以确定它们的差异。还评估了合并症、性别、止血带使用情况以及单侧或双侧手术对炎症标志物的作用。

方法

对192例连续的全膝关节置换术患者在术前、术后第2天(POD2)、POD14和POD30测量了CRP、IL6、ESR和TLC。

结果

CRP从术前的6.59mg/ml(标准差4.92)升至POD2时的190.57mg/ml(标准差77.62),然后在POD14时降至53.55mg/ml(标准差42.3),到POD三十时降至16.72mg/ml(标准差14.04)(p<0.001)。ESR从术前的18.81mm/hr(标准差7.17)升至POD2时的62.78mm/hr(标准差34.41),在POD14时降至57.05mm/hr(标准差26.63),到POD30时降至27.18mm/hr(标准差22.42)(p<0.001)。IL6在POD2时显著升高至163.60pg/ml(标准差51.05),而术前为6.55pg/ml(标准差2.58)(p<0.001)。RATKA组的CRP、ESR和TLC水平低于CTKA组(p<0.05)。糖尿病与炎症增加相关(p<0.05)。

结论

与传统方法相比,RATKA病例在几种标志物中显示出较低的炎症反应,疼痛评分也略好。止血带使用情况和患者性别等因素对炎症标志物没有显著影响。在合并症中,糖尿病会增加炎症。在大多数正常患者中,即使术后1个月炎症标志物仍未恢复到正常参考值。在评估潜在的人工关节感染时应考虑这种生理变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/12054132/8e61191d61af/12891_2025_8585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/12054132/8e61191d61af/12891_2025_8585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ae4/12054132/8e61191d61af/12891_2025_8585_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Inflammatory markers in conventional vs. active robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and other variables.传统全膝关节置换术与主动机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的炎症标志物及其他变量
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 6;26(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08585-0.
2
A prospective study comparing sleep quality using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at 8 weeks after robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a single-center study.一项前瞻性研究:在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术后8周,使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数比较睡眠质量——一项单中心研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 30;19(1):191. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02339-9.
3
Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的安全性和有效性。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(4):882-893. doi: 10.1111/os.14008. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
4
Improved accuracy of implant placement with an imageless handheld robotic system compared to conventional instrumentation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial using CT-based assessment of radiological outcomes.与传统器械相比,无影像手持式机器人系统在全膝关节置换患者中植入物放置的准确性提高:一项基于CT评估放射学结果的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5446-5452. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07590-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.比较 MAKO 机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术治疗膝骨关节炎的血清炎症指标和影像学结果:一项中国患者的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 4;23(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05373-y.
6
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty provides better joint line and posterior condylar offset restoration than conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of radiological outcomes.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术在关节线和后髁偏移恢复方面比传统全膝关节置换术更好:一项放射学结果的回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 17;19(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02329-x.
7
Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional technique for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective single centre study.机器人辅助与传统技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用:一项前瞻性单中心研究的早期结果。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1331-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05351-y. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
8
Natural course of postoperative C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in unilateral and simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.单侧及同期双侧全膝关节置换术后C反应蛋白和红细胞沉降率的自然病程
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08523-0.
9
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.一项比较常规夹具辅助全膝关节置换术与机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者全身炎症反应的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):113-122. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0602.R2.
10
Operating room efficiency for a high-volume surgeon in simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.高容量外科医生行同期双侧机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的手术室效率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):188. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01947-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative comparison between robotic-assisted and freehand total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与徒手全膝关节置换术的围手术期比较:一项半随机对照试验。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04709-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the fully automated active robotic system in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.全自动化主动机器人系统在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中的安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jan 13;37:102106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102106. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Comparison of serum inflammatory indicators and radiographic results in MAKO robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of Chinese patients.比较 MAKO 机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术治疗膝骨关节炎的血清炎症指标和影像学结果:一项中国患者的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 May 4;23(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05373-y.
3
Active robotic technologies for total knee arthroplasty.
主动式机器人技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2069-2075. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04044-2. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.一项比较常规夹具辅助全膝关节置换术与机器人辅助全膝关节置换术患者全身炎症反应的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):113-122. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0602.R2.
5
Computer and robotic - assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes.计算机及机器人辅助全膝关节置换术:疗效综述
J Exp Orthop. 2020 Sep 24;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40634-020-00278-y.
6
What are the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty over conventional manual total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative studies.与传统手动全膝关节置换术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的优势有哪些?一项比较研究的系统评价。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8657. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8657. eCollection 2020 Jun 29.
7
Inflammatory markers and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus.炎症标志物与2型糖尿病的控制
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):800-804. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.061. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
8
Correlations between inflammatory cytokines, muscle damage markers and acute postoperative pain following primary total knee arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后炎症细胞因子、肌肉损伤标志物与急性术后疼痛之间的相关性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 17;18(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1597-y.
9
Measurement of the inflammatory response in the early postoperative period after hip and knee arthroplasty.髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期炎症反应的测量。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Oct;53(11):1785-92. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1055.
10
Definition of periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围感染的定义。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1331. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 21.