Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Princess Grace Hospital, London, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):113-122. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-0602.R2.
The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (conventional TKA) versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (robotic TKA). Secondary aims were to compare the macroscopic soft tissue injury, femoral and tibial bone trauma, localized thermal response, and the accuracy of component positioning between the two treatment groups.
This prospective randomized controlled trial included 30 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing conventional TKA versus robotic TKA. Predefined serum markers of inflammation and localized knee temperature were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at six hours, day 1, day 2, day 7, and day 28 following TKA. Blinded observers used the Macroscopic Soft Tissue Injury (MASTI) classification system to grade intraoperative periarticular soft tissue injury and bone trauma. Plain radiographs were used to assess the accuracy of achieving the planned postioning of the components in both groups.
Patients undergoing conventional TKA and robotic TKA had comparable changes in the postoperative systemic inflammatory and localized thermal response at six hours, day 1, day 2, and day 28 after surgery. Robotic TKA had significantly reduced levels of interleukin-6 (p < 0.001), tumour necrosis factor-α (p = 0.021), ESR (p = 0.001), CRP (p = 0.004), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.007), and creatine kinase (p = 0.004) at day 7 after surgery compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with significantly improved preservation of the periarticular soft tissue envelope (p < 0.001), and reduced femoral (p = 0.012) and tibial (p = 0.023) bone trauma compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA significantly improved the accuracy of achieving the planned limb alignment (p < 0.001), femoral component positioning (p < 0.001), and tibial component positioning (p < 0.001) compared with conventional TKA.
Robotic TKA was associated with a transient reduction in the early (day 7) postoperative inflammatory response but there was no difference in the immediate (< 48 hours) or late (day 28) postoperative systemic inflammatory response compared with conventional TKA. Robotic TKA was associated with decreased iatrogenic periarticular soft tissue injury, reduced femoral and tibial bone trauma, and improved accuracy of component positioning compared with conventional TKA. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(1):113-122.
本研究的主要目的是比较常规夹具辅助全膝关节置换术(常规 TKA)与机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(机器人 TKA)术后的全身炎症反应。次要目的是比较两组治疗中宏观软组织损伤、股骨和胫骨骨损伤、局部热反应以及组件定位的准确性。
本前瞻性随机对照试验纳入 30 例膝关节骨关节炎患者,分别接受常规 TKA 与机器人 TKA。在 TKA 前、术后 6 小时、第 1 天、第 2 天、第 7 天和第 28 天采集炎症和局部膝关节温度的预定血清标志物。盲法观察者使用宏观软组织损伤(MASTI)分类系统对关节周围软组织损伤和骨损伤进行分级。通过平片评估两组中组件的定位准确性。
接受常规 TKA 和机器人 TKA 的患者在术后 6 小时、第 1 天、第 2 天和第 28 天的术后全身炎症和局部热反应变化无差异。与常规 TKA 相比,机器人 TKA 在术后第 7 天的白细胞介素-6(p < 0.001)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(p = 0.021)、红细胞沉降率(p = 0.001)、C 反应蛋白(p = 0.004)、乳酸脱氢酶(p = 0.007)和肌酸激酶(p = 0.004)水平显著降低。机器人 TKA 与常规 TKA 相比,关节周围软组织包膜的保存明显改善(p < 0.001),股骨(p = 0.012)和胫骨(p = 0.023)骨损伤减少。与常规 TKA 相比,机器人 TKA 显著提高了达到计划肢体对线(p < 0.001)、股骨组件定位(p < 0.001)和胫骨组件定位(p < 0.001)的准确性。
与常规 TKA 相比,机器人 TKA 可使术后早期(第 7 天)炎症反应短暂降低,但在术后即刻(< 48 小时)或晚期(第 28 天)全身炎症反应方面无差异。与常规 TKA 相比,机器人 TKA 可减少医源性关节周围软组织损伤,减少股骨和胫骨骨损伤,并提高组件定位的准确性。
文献出处:The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2021;36(1):113-122.