Lathan Ross, Daysley Hannah, Ravindhran Bharadhwaj, Lim Arthur, Cutteridge Joseph, Sidapra Misha, Long Judith, Hitchman Louise, Beltran-Alvarez Pedro, Carradice Daniel, Smith George, Chetter Ian
Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Centre for Clinical Sciences, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK.
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf015.
There is sparse evidence of the relationship between environmental and financial costs of surgical-site infection. Identifying areas of high-cost burden would enable key targets for clinical interventions to aid in achieving the UK national net zero healthcare system strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the environmental and financial costs of surgical-site infection, subclassified by severity of infection.
This prospective observational study evaluated patients with and without surgical-site infection after a variety of lower limb vascular surgery using National Health Service and Personal and Social Services perspectives. The severity of surgical-site infection was defined using both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and management-based criteria where patients with mild surgical-site infection required oral antibiotics, patients with moderate surgical-site infection required intravenous antibiotics, and patients with severe surgical-site infection required further surgical interventions.
A total of 99 patients were included, with 22 patients (22.2%) diagnosed with surgical-site infection. The mean(s.d.) environmental cost without surgical-site infection was 10.3(24.3) kgCO2e (95% c.i. 4.8 to 15.9) per patient. Emissions increased with surgical-site infection severity, with mild producing 94.6(53.9) kgCO2e (95% c.i. 63.5 to 125.8, 918% increase), moderate producing 648(407.6) kgCO2e (95% c.i. -0.1 to 1296.6, 6291% increase) and severe producing 2651.4(2217.1) kgCO2e (95% c.i. -966.5 to 6347.2, 25 742% increase) per patient. The mean(s.d.) financial cost without surgical-site infection was €73.26(€160.27) (95% c.i. 36.91 to 109.72) that increased with severity, with mild costing €392.25(225.69) (95% c.i. 262.16 to 523.00, 536% increase), moderate costing €9754.46(5059.77) (95% c.i. 1704.65 to 17 820.68, 13 317% increase), and severe costing €37 035.60(32 910.84) (95% c.i. -15 376.07 to 89 447.52, 50 521% increase) per episode of infection (£1 = €1.20 (conversion date 25 October 2024)).
Environmental and financial costs are strongly correlated with surgical-site infection severity and display an exponential increase as severity increases. Overall, surgical-site infection incurs a cost of €15.58 for every kgCO2e produced. Environmental discounting should be explored and incorporated into sustainability assessments for robust accounting methodology. Surgical-site infection should be evaluated for severity rather than as a binary outcome for comprehensive assessment.
手术部位感染的环境成本与经济成本之间的关系证据稀少。确定高成本负担领域将有助于确定临床干预的关键目标,以助力实现英国国家医疗系统净零战略。本研究旨在评估手术部位感染的环境成本与经济成本,并按感染严重程度进行分类。
这项前瞻性观察性研究从英国国家医疗服务体系以及个人和社会服务的角度,对各类下肢血管手术后发生和未发生手术部位感染的患者进行了评估。手术部位感染的严重程度根据疾病控制与预防中心的标准以及基于治疗管理的标准来定义,其中轻度手术部位感染患者需要口服抗生素,中度手术部位感染患者需要静脉注射抗生素,重度手术部位感染患者需要进一步的手术干预。
共纳入99例患者,其中22例(22.2%)被诊断为手术部位感染。未发生手术部位感染的患者平均(标准差)环境成本为每人10.3(24.3)千克二氧化碳当量(95%置信区间4.8至15.9)。随着手术部位感染严重程度的增加,排放量也随之增加,轻度感染患者产生94.6(53.9)千克二氧化碳当量(95%置信区间63.5至125.8,增加918%),中度感染患者产生648(407.6)千克二氧化碳当量(95%置信区间 -0.1至1296.6,增加6291%),重度感染患者产生2651.4(2217.1)千克二氧化碳当量(95%置信区间 -966.5至6347.2,增加25742%)。未发生手术部位感染的患者平均(标准差)经济成本为73.26欧元(160.27欧元)(95%置信区间36.91至109.72),且随着严重程度增加而上升,轻度感染患者成本为392.25欧元(225.69欧元)(95%置信区间262.16至523.00,增加536%),中度感染患者成本为9754.46欧元(5059.77欧元)(95%置信区间1704.65至17820.68,增加13317%),重度感染患者每次感染成本为37035.60欧元(32910.84欧元)(95%置信区间 -15376.07至89447.52,增加50521%)(1英镑 = 1.20欧元(换算日期为2024年10月25日))。
环境成本和经济成本与手术部位感染严重程度密切相关,且随着严重程度增加呈指数上升。总体而言,每产生1千克二氧化碳当量,手术部位感染会产生15.58欧元的成本。应探索环境贴现并将其纳入可持续性评估,以建立稳健的核算方法。对于手术部位感染,应评估其严重程度,而非仅作为二元结果进行全面评估。