Suppr超能文献

早期幼苗筛选揭示立陶宛大麦品种中未知的抗铝机制。

Early Seedling Screening Reveals Unidentified Al Resistance Mechanisms in Lithuanian Barley Cultivars.

作者信息

Mensonas Vilius Jurgis, Kleizaitė Violeta, Leistrumaitė Algė, Šiukšta Raimondas

机构信息

Institute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekis Ave. 7, 10257 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institutas Ave. 1, Akademija, 58344 Kėdainiai, Lithuania.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 17;26(8):3803. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083803.

Abstract

Aluminum toxicity in acidic soils represents a significant environmental stressor that affects yields worldwide and is only expected to worsen. Breeding resistant varieties remains the most viable solution; however, fast and robust procedures to determine cultivar viability must be developed and applied to promising genotypes. This study explored historical and modern Lithuanian-bred barley cultivars using morphometrical and biochemical markers for Al resistance and sequence and expression analyses of potential candidate genes. Morphometric seedling measurements (relative root length reduction -13.65 ± 0.33% ( < 0.001) and root tolerance index 0.86 ± 0.44 after 72 h at 8 mM Al stress) revealed the modern cv. 'Ema DS' to be the most Al resistant, while biochemical assays offered a poor distinction between the Al-resistant and sensitive cultivars. Thus, we determined that morphometric parameters were more effective in the early screening for barley Al resistance. The genetic screening of well-established Al resistance markers in the barley citrate transporter HvAACT1 revealed a mismatch between the observed barley phenotypes and genotypes. Further testing was conducted through expression analyses of and seven aquaporin family genes, which revealed a correlation between the best empirical performance in cv. 'Ema DS' and a high (2.02 fold change, < 0.05) expression, despite the lack of established genetic markers, as well as a stress-induced significant upregulation of aquaporin TIP4;1 (2.45 fold change, < 0.05), suggesting previously undiscovered regulatory mechanisms of external and internal detoxification influencing Al resistance in Lithuanian barley cultivars, as well as potential future candidates for Al-resistant barley breeding programs.

摘要

酸性土壤中的铝毒是一个重大的环境压力因素,影响着全球作物产量,而且预计只会恶化。培育抗性品种仍然是最可行的解决方案;然而,必须开发出快速且可靠的程序来确定品种的生存能力,并将其应用于有潜力的基因型。本研究利用形态学和生化标记来检测铝抗性,并对潜在候选基因进行序列和表达分析,以此探究立陶宛培育的历史和现代大麦品种。形态学幼苗测量结果(在8 mM铝胁迫72小时后,相对根长减少-13.65 ± 0.33%(< 0.001),根耐受指数为0.86 ± 0.44)表明,现代品种‘Ema DS’对铝的抗性最强,而生化分析在抗铝和感铝品种之间的区分效果不佳。因此,我们确定形态学参数在大麦铝抗性早期筛选中更有效。对大麦柠檬酸转运蛋白HvAACT1中已确立的铝抗性标记进行基因筛选,结果显示观察到的大麦表型与基因型不匹配。通过对 和七个水通道蛋白家族基因的表达分析进行了进一步测试,结果表明,尽管缺乏已确立的遗传标记,但在品种‘Ema DS’中最佳的实际表现与高 (2.02倍变化,< 0.05)表达之间存在相关性,同时水通道蛋白TIP4;1受到胁迫诱导显著上调(2.45倍变化,< 0.05),这表明存在以前未发现的影响立陶宛大麦品种铝抗性的外部和内部解毒调节机制,以及未来抗铝大麦育种计划的潜在候选基因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e2/12028139/5af71052ca55/ijms-26-03803-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley.
Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Aug;48(8):1081-91. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm091. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
3
Breeding for an elite malting barley cultivar with acid soil tolerance.
Commun Biol. 2024 Sep 28;7(1):1203. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06903-1.
5
Multi-omics analysis unveils early molecular responses to aluminum toxicity in barley root tip.
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024 Dec;217:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109209. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
6
A new allele for aluminium tolerance gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).
BMC Genomics. 2016 Mar 5;17:186. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2551-3.
7
The barley MATE gene, HvAACT1, increases citrate efflux and Al(3+) tolerance when expressed in wheat and barley.
Ann Bot. 2013 Aug;112(3):603-12. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct135. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
Molecular mapping of a gene responsible for Al-activated secretion of citrate in barley.
J Exp Bot. 2004 Jun;55(401):1335-41. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh152. Epub 2004 May 21.
10
Comparative proteomic analysis of aluminum tolerance in tibetan wild and cultivated barleys.
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e63428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063428. Print 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Aluminum phytotoxicity in acidic environments: A comprehensive review of plant tolerance and adaptation strategies.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Jan 1;269:115791. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115791. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
Global characteristics and drivers of sodium and aluminum concentrations in freshly fallen plant litter.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 13;14:1174697. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1174697. eCollection 2023.
5
Aluminum in plant: Benefits, toxicity and tolerance mechanisms.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 13;13:1085998. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1085998. eCollection 2022.
6
Genetic diversity and population structure assessment of Western Canadian barley cooperative trials.
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 9;13:1006719. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1006719. eCollection 2022.
7
Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity.
New Phytol. 2022 Jan;233(1):84-118. doi: 10.1111/nph.17733. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
9
Overcoming barriers to the registration of new plant varieties under the DUS system.
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 8;4(1):302. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01840-9.
10
Morpho-physiological responses of indica rice (Oryza sativa sub. indica) to aluminum toxicity at seedling stage.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29321-29331. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12804-1. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验