Brandt Lasse, Efthimiou Orestis, Siafis Spyridon, Schneider-Thoma Johannes, Stuke Heiner, Ayrilmaz Hakan, Hasan Alkomiet, Heinz Andreas, Gutwinski Stefan, Kane John M, Leucht Stefan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Berlin-Potsdam, Berlin, Germany.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0587.
It has been hypothesized that the association between acute-phase treatment with antipsychotic (vs placebo) and outcomes might be larger in individuals who were not recently treated compared to recently treated individuals. However, evidence is still lacking.
To compare the association between antipsychotic (vs placebo) acute-phase treatment and outcomes in individuals who were not recently treated to recently treated individuals.
The Yale University Open Data Access Project's database was searched from inception to April 16, 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42021224350).
We included placebo-controlled antipsychotic acute-phase randomized clinical trials with participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged 18 years and older. Participants were divided into 2 groups: recently treated (treated with an antipsychotic before the start of randomized treatment) and not recently treated (not treated for ≥4 weeks before the start of randomized treatment).
Multiple linear regression models were implemented to estimate difference in mean difference (DMD), defined as mean difference (antipsychotic vs placebo) in not recently treated minus mean difference in recently treated, and 95% confidence intervals in each study. DMD and 95% confidence intervals were synthesized across studies using a random effects meta-analysis model.
The primary outcome was overall symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] score after 6 weeks).
A total of 470 trials were identified, of which 12 were eligible for the analysis. A total of 692 individuals were included in the not recently treated group and randomized to antipsychotic (n = 502) or placebo (n = 190), and 2089 individuals were included in the recently treated group and randomized to antipsychotic (n = 1513) or placebo (n = 576). Overall median (IQR) age of included individuals was 38 (30-48) years, and 998 individuals (35.9%) were female. No evidence of difference in the antipsychotic vs placebo outcomes was detected across the not recently treated and recently treated individuals (DMD, 0.8 PANSS points; 95% CI, -3.6 to 5.2). Not recently treated individuals had better outcomes with both the antipsychotic and placebo compared to recently treated individuals.
In this individual participant data meta-analysis, the association between antipsychotic (vs placebo) acute-phase treatment and outcomes may be similar in individuals with and without recent treatment. Individuals who were not recently treated had better outcomes with both the antipsychotic and placebo compared with recently treated individuals.
有假设认为,与近期接受过治疗的个体相比,未近期接受治疗的个体在使用抗精神病药物进行急性期治疗(与安慰剂相比)和预后之间的关联可能更大。然而,目前仍缺乏证据。
比较未近期接受治疗的个体与近期接受治疗的个体在使用抗精神病药物(与安慰剂相比)进行急性期治疗和预后之间的关联。
检索了耶鲁大学开放数据访问项目的数据库,时间范围从创建至2024年4月16日(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库编号CRD42021224350)。
我们纳入了针对18岁及以上精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的安慰剂对照抗精神病药物急性期随机临床试验。参与者被分为两组:近期接受过治疗(在随机治疗开始前接受过抗精神病药物治疗)和未近期接受治疗(在随机治疗开始前≥4周未接受治疗)。
采用多元线性回归模型来估计平均差异的差异(DMD),其定义为未近期接受治疗者中抗精神病药物组与安慰剂组的平均差异减去近期接受治疗者中的平均差异,并计算每项研究的95%置信区间。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型对各研究中的DMD和95%置信区间进行合成。
主要结局为总体症状(6周后的阳性和阴性症状量表[PANSS]评分)。
共识别出470项试验,其中12项符合分析条件。未近期接受治疗组共纳入692名个体,随机分为抗精神病药物组(n = 502)或安慰剂组(n = 190);近期接受治疗组共纳入2089名个体,随机分为抗精神病药物组(n = 1513)或安慰剂组(n = 576)。纳入个体的总体年龄中位数(四分位间距)为38(30 - 48)岁,998名个体(35.9%)为女性。在未近期接受治疗和近期接受治疗的个体中,未检测到抗精神病药物与安慰剂治疗结局存在差异的证据(DMD为0.8个PANSS评分;95%置信区间为 - 3.6至5.2)。与近期接受治疗的个体相比,未近期接受治疗的个体在使用抗精神病药物和安慰剂时均有更好的结局。
在这项个体参与者数据荟萃分析中,近期接受治疗和未近期接受治疗的个体在抗精神病药物(与安慰剂相比)急性期治疗和结局之间的关联可能相似。与近期接受治疗的个体相比,未近期接受治疗的个体在使用抗精神病药物和安慰剂时均有更好的结局。