Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的急性疗效:近期荟萃分析综述

The acute efficacy of antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review of recent meta-analyses.

作者信息

Haddad Peter M, Correll Christoph U

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Glen Oaks, NY, USA Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct 8;8(11):303-318. doi: 10.1177/2045125318781475. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Schizophrenia is the eighth leading cause of disability worldwide in people aged 15-44 years. Before antidopaminergic antipsychotics were introduced in the 1950s, no effective medications existed for the treatment of schizophrenia. This review summarizes key meta-analytic findings regarding antipsychotic efficacy in the acute treatment of schizophrenia, including clozapine in treatment-resistant patients. In the most comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted in multi-episode schizophrenia, antipsychotics outperformed placebo regarding total symptoms, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, quality of life and social functioning. Amongst these outcomes, the standardized mean difference for overall symptoms was largest, that is, 0.47 (95% credible interval = 0.42-0.51), approaching a medium effect size, being reduced to 0.38 when publication bias and small-trial effects were accounted for. A comparison of two meta-analyses indicated that first-episode patients, compared with multi-episode patients, were more likely to have at least minimal treatment response [⩾20% Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)/Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score reduction: 81% 51%] and good response (⩾50% PANSS/BPRS score reduction: 52% 23%). In multi-episode schizophrenia, no response or worsening after 2 weeks of a therapeutic antipsychotic dose was highly predictive of not achieving a good response at endpoint (median treatment = 6 weeks: specificity = 86%; positive predictive value = 90%), suggesting a change in treatment should be considered in such cases. In first-episode psychosis, adequately dosed antipsychotic treatment trials for more than 2 weeks are recommended before using no response or worsening as a decision point for aborting a given antipsychotic. In clearly defined treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine generally outperformed other antipsychotics, especially when dosed appropriately (target = 3-6 months' duration; trough clozapine level ⩾350-400 μg/L) with a response rate (⩾20% PANSS/BPRS) of 33% by 3 months of treatment. High antipsychotic doses and psychotropic combinations are unlikely to be superior to standard doses of antipsychotic monotherapy. Acute antipsychotic efficacy in schizophrenia depends on the targeted symptom domain (greater efficacy: total and positive symptoms, lesser efficacy: negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, social functioning and quality of life). Greater antipsychotic efficacy is associated with higher total baseline symptom severity, treatment-naïveté/first-episode status, shorter illness duration, and trials that are nonindustry sponsored and that have a lower placebo effect. The heterogeneity of antipsychotic response across individuals and key symptom domains, the considerable degree of nonresponse/treatment resistance in multi-episode patients, and the adverse effect potential of antipsychotics are major limitations, underscoring the need to develop new medications for the treatment of schizophrenia. Drug development should include matching patient subgroups, which are identified by means of clinical and biomarker variables, to mechanisms of action of novel medications, targeting specific symptom domains, and investigating mechanisms of action other than dopaminergic blockade.

摘要

精神分裂症是全球15 - 44岁人群中导致残疾的第八大主要原因。在20世纪50年代引入抗多巴胺能抗精神病药物之前,没有有效的药物可用于治疗精神分裂症。本综述总结了关于抗精神病药物在精神分裂症急性治疗中的疗效的关键荟萃分析结果,包括氯氮平在难治性患者中的疗效。在对多发作精神分裂症进行的随机对照试验的最全面荟萃分析中,抗精神病药物在总症状、阳性症状、阴性症状、抑郁症状、生活质量和社会功能方面均优于安慰剂。在这些结果中,总体症状的标准化平均差最大,即0.47(95%可信区间 = 0.42 - 0.51),接近中等效应大小,在考虑发表偏倚和小试验效应后降至0.38。两项荟萃分析的比较表明,与多发作患者相比,首发患者更有可能至少有最小治疗反应[阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)/简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评分降低⩾20%:81%对51%]和良好反应(PANSS/BPRS评分降低⩾50%:52%对23%)。在多发作精神分裂症中,治疗性抗精神病药物剂量治疗2周后无反应或病情恶化高度预示着在终点时不能获得良好反应(中位治疗时间 = 6周:特异性 = 86%;阳性预测值 = 90%),这表明在这种情况下应考虑改变治疗方案。在首发精神病中,建议在使用无反应或病情恶化作为中止某种抗精神病药物的决策点之前,进行超过2周的充分剂量抗精神病药物治疗试验。在明确界定的难治性精神分裂症中,氯氮平通常优于其他抗精神病药物,特别是当剂量合适时(目标治疗持续时间 = 3 - 6个月;氯氮平谷浓度⩾350 - 400μg/L),治疗3个月时的反应率(⩾20% PANSS/BPRS)为33%。高剂量抗精神病药物和精神药物联合使用不太可能优于标准剂量的抗精神病药物单一疗法。精神分裂症的急性抗精神病药物疗效取决于靶向症状领域(疗效较好:总症状和阳性症状,疗效较差:阴性症状、抑郁症状、社会功能和生活质量)。更高的抗精神病药物疗效与更高的基线总症状严重程度、未接受过治疗/首发状态、更短的病程以及非行业资助且安慰剂效应较低的试验相关。个体间和关键症状领域的抗精神病药物反应异质性、多发作患者中相当程度的无反应/治疗抵抗以及抗精神病药物的不良反应潜力是主要限制因素,这突出了开发治疗精神分裂症新药物的必要性。药物开发应包括通过临床和生物标志物变量识别患者亚组,并将其与新型药物的作用机制相匹配,靶向特定症状领域,并研究多巴胺能阻断以外的作用机制。

相似文献

3
Quetiapine : A Review of its Use in Schizophrenia.喹硫平:在精神分裂症中的应用评价。
CNS Drugs. 1998 Apr;9(4):325-40. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199809040-00007.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 6;1(1):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验