Hu Qi, Li Qinglin, Liu Xingyan, Ding Kun, Li Zongen, Bai Yuxiang
College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Key Laboratory of Cold and Arid Regions Eco-Hydraulic Engineering of Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;18(8):1695. doi: 10.3390/ma18081695.
To investigate the effects of impact and static compaction methods on the mechanical properties and crack evolution of rock-like materials with varying particle sizes. Uniaxial compression tests combined with Digital Image Correlation (DIC) technology were conducted on specimens of two aeolian sand gradations (0.075-0.18 mm and 0.22-0.5 mm) and one quartz sand gradation (0.22-0.5 mm). The study focused on elastic modulus, peak strength, stress-strain behavior, failure modes, surface deformation fields, crack propagation paths, and strain evolution at characteristic points under both compaction methods. Finally, the microstructure of specimens was analyzed and compared with natural rock analogs. Key results include: (1) At an identical density of 1.82 g/cm, static-compacted specimens of fine-grained aeolian sand (0.075-0.18 mm) exhibited higher elastic modulus and peak strength compared to impact-compacted counterparts, whereas inverse trends were observed for coarse-grained aeolian sand (0.22-0.5 mm) and quartz sand specimens; (2) Under equivalent compaction energy (254.8 J), the hierarchy of mechanical performance was: quartz sand > coarse-grained aeolian sand > fine-grained aeolian sand; (3) Static-compacted specimens predominantly failed through tensile splitting, while impact-compacted specimens exhibited shear-dominated failure modes; (4) DIC full-field strain mapping revealed rapid propagation of primary cracks along pre-existing weak planes in static-compacted specimens, forming through-going tensile fractures. In contrast, impact-compacted specimens developed fractal strain field structures with coordinated evolution of shear bands and secondary tensile cracks; (5) Microstructural comparisons showed that static-compacted fine-grained aeolian sand specimens exhibited root-like structures with high porosity, resembling weakly consolidated sedimentary rocks. Impact-compacted coarse-grained aeolian sand specimens displayed stepped structures with dense packing, analogous to strongly cemented sandstones.
为研究冲击压实和静压压实方法对不同粒径类岩石材料力学性能及裂纹扩展的影响。对两种风积砂级配(0.075 - 0.18毫米和0.22 - 0.5毫米)以及一种石英砂级配(0.22 - 0.5毫米)的试样进行了单轴压缩试验,并结合数字图像相关(DIC)技术。该研究聚焦于两种压实方法下的弹性模量、峰值强度、应力 - 应变行为、破坏模式、表面变形场、裂纹扩展路径以及特征点处的应变演化。最后,对试样进行微观结构分析,并与天然岩石类似物进行比较。主要结果包括:(1)在相同密度1.82克/立方厘米时,细粒风积砂(0.075 - 0.18毫米)的静压压实试样相比冲击压实试样表现出更高的弹性模量和峰值强度,而粗粒风积砂(0.22 - 0.5毫米)和石英砂试样则呈现相反趋势;(2)在等效压实能量(254.8焦耳)下,力学性能排序为:石英砂>粗粒风积砂>细粒风积砂;(3)静压压实试样主要通过拉伸劈裂破坏,而冲击压实试样表现出以剪切为主的破坏模式;(4)DIC全场应变映射显示,静压压实试样中主裂纹沿既有弱面快速扩展,形成贯穿拉伸裂缝。相比之下,冲击压实试样发展出分形应变场结构,剪切带和次生拉伸裂纹协同演化;(5)微观结构比较表明,静压压实的细粒风积砂试样呈现高孔隙率的根状结构,类似于弱固结沉积岩。冲击压实的粗粒风积砂试样显示出致密堆积的阶梯状结构,类似于强胶结砂岩。