Suppr超能文献

推拿手法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的有效性和成本效益:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy for temporomandibular disorder: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Cho Jae-Heung, Kim Koh-Woon, Kim Hyungsuk, Shin Woo-Chul, Kim Me-Riong, Kim Joowon, Kim Min-Young, Cho Hyun-Woo, Ha In-Hyuk, Lee Yoon Jae

机构信息

Department of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322402. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy (CMT) for temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) remain unclear. Here, we compared the effectiveness of CMT and usual care for treating myofascial TMD. A 26-week randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2018 to 2019 with 80 patients across five hospitals in Korea who were diagnosed with myofascial TMD and had temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain lasting more than three months. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the CMT group, which underwent eight sessions of CMT over four weeks, or the usual care (UC) group, which received physical therapy for the same period. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in terms of pain, function, and quality of life over 26 weeks. For determining cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were analyzed, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the societal and healthcare system perspectives were calculated. At week 5, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores decreased more in the CMT group than in the control group, although the difference was statistically insignificant. The CMT group showed significant improvement in specific functional and quality of life measures, particularly in the EuroQoL-VAS (-13.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] -20.03 to -6.38) and the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale-Global score of 0.59 (95% CI 0.13 to 1.05), through improvements were not consistent across all indices. The CMT group showed a slightly higher QALY, and the 26-week incremental cost in the CMT group was $338 lower than that of the usual care group. The cost of CMT was $150 higher than that of usual care, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per utility ranged from $4,011 to $17,851. When a "willingness to pay for treatment ($26,375)" threshold was applied, the probability of CMT being cost-effective was 68.1%-98.3%. Despite no significant differences in pain reduction at week 5, CMT was found to be a cost-effective treatment for TMD, particularly for improving function and quality of life. These findings may serve as a basis for considering the expansion of national health insurance coverage for Chuna therapy in Korea. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service KCT0003192.

摘要

推拿整复手法治疗(CMT)用于颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的有效性和成本效益仍不明确。在此,我们比较了CMT与常规治疗对治疗肌筋膜性TMD的有效性。2018年至2019年进行了一项为期26周的随机对照试验,纳入了韩国五家医院的80例被诊断为肌筋膜性TMD且颞下颌关节(TMJ)疼痛持续超过三个月的患者。患者按1:1比例随机分配至CMT组(在四周内接受八次CMT治疗)或常规治疗(UC)组(在同一时期接受物理治疗)。在26周内根据疼痛、功能和生活质量评估治疗效果。为确定成本效益,分析了质量调整生命年(QALY),并从社会和医疗保健系统角度计算了增量成本效益比。在第5周时,CMT组的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分下降幅度大于对照组,尽管差异无统计学意义。CMT组在特定功能和生活质量指标上有显著改善,尤其是在欧洲五维度健康量表 - VAS(-13.21(95%置信区间[CI] -20.03至-6.38))和下颌功能受限量表 - 总体评分0.59(95%CI 0.13至1.05),不过并非所有指标的改善都一致。CMT组的QALY略高,且CMT组26周的增量成本比常规治疗组低338美元。CMT的成本比常规治疗高150美元,每效用的增量成本效益比在4011美元至17851美元之间。当应用“治疗支付意愿(26375美元)”阈值时,CMT具有成本效益的概率为68.1% - 98.3%。尽管在第5周时疼痛减轻方面无显著差异,但CMT被发现是一种治疗TMD的成本效益高的方法,特别是在改善功能和生活质量方面。这些发现可能为考虑在韩国扩大国家健康保险对推拿疗法的覆盖范围提供依据。试验注册:韩国临床研究信息服务中心KCT0003192 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d4d/12057850/0cbb9f71b0bd/pone.0322402.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验