Xu Ruijing, Guo Fei, Yang Chunshui, Zhu Feiqi
Cognitive Impairment Ward, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Department of Neurology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2025 Jul;254:108925. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.108925. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
To investigate the predictive value of Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) on unfavorable outcomes of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke (ALVOS) in patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT).
MATERIAL & METHOD: We retrospectively recruited 96 cases with ALVOS who underwent MT. These cases were divided into two groups including the favorable outcome group (3-month modified Rankin Scale scores (mRS) of 0-2) and the unfavorable outcome group (3-month mRS of 3-6). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the independent risk factors of the 3-month unfavorable outcome of ALVOS. Moreover, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to estimate the valuable predictor of NLR, LMR, and the combination of NLR and LMR on unfavorable outcomes of ALVOS after MT.
46.9 % (45/96) cases had an unfavorable outcome and 53.1 % (51/96) cases had a favorable outcome. In the univariate regression analysis, baseline NIHSS score, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and fasting glucose were included in the multi-factor binary logistic regression, and this revealed that NLR (OR 3.776, 95 %CI 1.067-13.363, p = 0.039) and LMR (OR 0.092, 95 %CI 0.017-0.0506, p = 0.006) were independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes (mRS score 3-6) at 3-month. Higher NLR (> 2.984) and lower LMR (< 3.775) were independently associated with unfavorable outcomes, and the combined predictive levels of both NLR and LMR (AUC = 0.941) were higher than single indicators (NLR, AUC = 0.876; LMR, AUC = 0.934).
The combination of NLR and LMR was a more powerful predictor of unfavorable outcomes of ALVOS after MT than NLR alone.
探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)对接受机械取栓(MT)的急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中(ALVOS)患者不良预后的预测价值。
我们回顾性纳入了96例接受MT的ALVOS患者。这些病例分为两组,包括预后良好组(3个月改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)为0 - 2)和预后不良组(3个月mRS为3 - 6)。采用Logistic回归分析来检验ALVOS患者3个月不良预后的独立危险因素。此外,我们绘制了受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),以评估NLR、LMR以及NLR与LMR联合对MT后ALVOS不良预后的预测价值。
46.9%(45/96)的病例预后不良,53.1%(51/96)的病例预后良好。在单因素回归分析中,基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、症状性颅内出血和空腹血糖被纳入多因素二元Logistic回归,结果显示NLR(比值比[OR] 3.776,95%置信区间[CI] 1.067 - 1,3.363,p = 0.039)和LMR(OR 0.092,95%CI 0.017 - 0.506,p = 0.006)是3个月时不良预后(mRS评分3 - 6)的独立预测因素。较高的NLR(> 2.984)和较低的LMR(< 3.775)与不良预后独立相关,且NLR和LMR联合预测水平(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.941)高于单一指标(NLR,AUC = 0.876;LMR,AUC = 0.934)。
与单独的NLR相比,NLR和LMR联合对MT后ALVOS不良预后的预测能力更强。