Fang June, Wang Dengjun, Wilkin Richard, Su Chunming
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellow at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jun;385:125524. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125524. Epub 2025 May 6.
Biochar has received increasing attention in recent years as a potentially cost-competitive adsorbent for removing various contaminants from surface water and groundwater. However, most published studies have been conducted in the laboratory on a bench scale. Laboratory conditions do not necessarily reflect the complex, heterogeneous, and dynamic field conditions of actual contaminated surface water and groundwater environments. There is a lack of comprehensive literature review regarding the performance of biochar for contaminant removal, especially under realistic field conditions and at field scale. Here, we evaluated 31 studies on realistic applications of biochar for water remediation by searching the keywords: pilot scale, field scale, and mesocosm scale combined with biochar and water remediation. Biochar was found to be incorporated into a variety of water remediation technologies for treating both inorganic and organic contaminants, such as nutrients, heavy metals, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals in polluted waters and wastewaters. Also, biochar showed the potential to be effective on a field scale or in realistic remediation technologies, although it is not always as effective as other sorbents, such as activated carbon (AC). This is partially because AC has better physicochemical characteristics such as higher surface area and more micropores. Effectiveness for contaminant removal varies according to the targeted contaminants, the type and dosage of biochar used, and the treatment technology incorporating biochar. Finally, knowledge gaps and future research areas are identified. For example, more field scale studies are needed to test the effectiveness of biochar as an adsorbent under realistic conditions to pinpoint specific characteristics suitable for target contaminants. Physicochemical characteristics of the biochar can also change over time during the treatment process due to weathering, which may negatively affect the treatment performance. The effects of scaling up production on biochar quality should therefore also be further investigated, as physicochemical characteristics can be affected by varying the synthesis conditions. Regeneration and disposal of spent biochar is another active research area to determine the overall treatment costs.
近年来,生物炭作为一种在去除地表水和地下水中各种污染物方面具有潜在成本竞争力的吸附剂,受到了越来越多的关注。然而,大多数已发表的研究都是在实验室的小试规模上进行的。实验室条件不一定能反映实际受污染的地表水和地下水环境的复杂、非均质性和动态现场条件。关于生物炭去除污染物性能的综合文献综述较少,特别是在实际现场条件和现场规模下。在此,我们通过搜索关键词:中试规模、现场规模和中宇宙规模,并结合生物炭和水修复,评估了31项关于生物炭在水修复实际应用的研究。研究发现,生物炭被纳入了多种水修复技术中,用于处理无机和有机污染物,如污染水体和废水中的营养物质、重金属、农药和药物。此外,生物炭在现场规模或实际修复技术中显示出有效的潜力,尽管它并不总是像其他吸附剂(如活性炭(AC))那样有效。部分原因是AC具有更好的物理化学特性,如更高的比表面积和更多的微孔。去除污染物的有效性因目标污染物、所用生物炭的类型和剂量以及包含生物炭的处理技术而异。最后,确定了知识空白和未来的研究领域。例如,需要更多的现场规模研究来测试生物炭在实际条件下作为吸附剂的有效性,以确定适合目标污染物的特定特性。在处理过程中,生物炭的物理化学特性也可能因风化而随时间变化,这可能会对处理性能产生负面影响。因此,还应进一步研究扩大生产规模对生物炭质量的影响,因为物理化学特性可能会因合成条件的变化而受到影响。废生物炭的再生和处置是另一个活跃的研究领域,以确定总体处理成本。