Long Xin-Xian, Yu Ze-Ning, Liu Shao-Wen, Gao Ting, Qiu Rong-Liang
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China; Maoming Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural & Rural Pollution Abatement and Environmental Safety, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Jul 5;472:134345. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134345. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
Biochar is widely accepted as a green and effective amendment for remediating heavy metals (HMs) contaminated soil, but its long-term efficiency and safety changes with biochar aging in fields. Currently, some reviews have qualitatively summarized biochar aging methods and mechanisms, aginginduced changes in biochar properties, and often ignored the potential eco-environmental risk during biochar aging process. Therefore, this review systematically summarizes the study methods of biochar aging, quantitatively compares the effects of different biochar aging process on its properties, and discusses the potential eco-environmental risk due to biochar aging in HMs contaminated soil. At present, various artificial aging methods (physical aging, chemical aging and biological aging) rather than natural field aging have been applied to study the changes of biochar's properties. Generally, biochar aging increases specific surface area (SSA), pore volume (PV), surface oxygen-containing functional group (OFGs) and O content, while decreases pH, ash, H, C and N content. Chemical aging method has a greater effect on the properties of biochar than other aging methods. In addition, biochar aging may lead to HMs remobilization and produce new types of pollutants, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) and colloidal/nano biochar particles, which consequently bring secondary eco-environmental risk. Finally, future research directions are suggested to establish a more accurate assessment method and model on biochar aging behavior and evaluate the environmental safety of aged biochar, in order to promote its wider application for remediating HMs contaminated soil.
生物炭作为一种修复重金属污染土壤的绿色有效改良剂已被广泛接受,但其长期效率和安全性会随田间生物炭老化而变化。目前,一些综述已定性总结了生物炭老化方法与机制、老化引起的生物炭性质变化,且常常忽略生物炭老化过程中的潜在生态环境风险。因此,本综述系统总结了生物炭老化的研究方法,定量比较了不同生物炭老化过程对其性质的影响,并探讨了生物炭在重金属污染土壤中老化所带来的潜在生态环境风险。目前,已采用各种人工老化方法(物理老化、化学老化和生物老化)而非自然田间老化来研究生物炭性质的变化。一般来说,生物炭老化会增加比表面积(SSA)、孔隙体积(PV)、表面含氧官能团(OFGs)和O含量,同时降低pH值、灰分、H、C和N含量。化学老化方法对生物炭性质的影响比其他老化方法更大。此外,生物炭老化可能导致重金属的再活化并产生新型污染物,如多环芳烃(PAHs)、环境持久性自由基(EPFRs)和胶体/纳米生物炭颗粒,从而带来次生生态环境风险。最后,建议了未来的研究方向,以建立更准确的生物炭老化行为评估方法和模型,并评估老化生物炭的环境安全性,从而促进其在修复重金属污染土壤方面的更广泛应用。