Nagy Jozsef, Major Zoltan, Maier Julia, Seebach Gabriel, Fenz Wolfgang, Thumfart Stefan, Giretzlehner Michael, Gruber Andreas, Rauch Philip-Rudolf, Gmeiner Matthias
eulerian-solutions e.U., Linz, Austria.
Institute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Jul;34(7):108335. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108335. Epub 2025 May 5.
This study investigates morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical factors influencing aneurysm rupture behavior, specifically focusing on Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) and Anterior Communicating Artery (ACOMM) aneurysms, using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analyses.
Data from 116 patients with aneurysms located in the MCA and ACOMM, including 81 ruptured and 35 stable aneurysms. Aneurysms were modeled with FSI methods to examine key parameters: aneurysm angle, wall shear stress, and equivalent Mises stress as well as additional parameters. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U-test to identify significant differences in these parameters between the two locations in stable and ruptured aneurysms. In a further step univariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed.
Results indicated no significant differences in the assessed parameters between ruptured MCA and ACOMM aneurysms. However, stable ACOMM aneurysms exhibited a larger aneurysm angle, lower wall equivalent stress as well as lower ratio of maximum WSS in the aneurysms and the parent vessel when compared to MCA aneurysms, indicating that ACOMM aneurysms may rupture at lower stresses possibly due to their higher aneurysm angle. Regression analysis underlines the statistical power of aneurysm angle.
These findings highlight morphological and hemodynamic differences in stable aneurysms across MCA and ACOMM locations. Stable MCA aneurysms appear to tolerate higher wall stress values compared to ACOMM aneurysms, leading to greater susceptibility to rupture in ACOMM aneurysms at stress levels where MCA aneurysms can remain stable. This study underscores the importance of considering morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical factors as well as the distinction between stable and ruptured aneurysms, to improve the accuracy of rupture risk.
本研究使用计算流体动力学(CFD)和流固耦合(FSI)分析,调查影响动脉瘤破裂行为的形态学、血流动力学和结构力学因素,特别关注大脑中动脉(MCA)和前交通动脉(ACOMM)动脉瘤。
收集了116例位于MCA和ACOMM的动脉瘤患者的数据,包括81例破裂动脉瘤和35例稳定动脉瘤。采用FSI方法对动脉瘤进行建模,以检查关键参数:动脉瘤角度、壁面剪应力、等效应力以及其他参数。使用曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计分析,以确定稳定和破裂动脉瘤在这两个位置的这些参数之间的显著差异。进一步进行单变量和多变量回归分析。
结果表明,破裂的MCA和ACOMM动脉瘤在评估参数上没有显著差异。然而,与MCA动脉瘤相比,稳定的ACOMM动脉瘤表现出更大的动脉瘤角度、更低的壁面等效应力以及动脉瘤与母血管中最大壁面剪应力的更低比值,表明ACOMM动脉瘤可能在较低应力下破裂,这可能是由于其较大的动脉瘤角度。回归分析强调了动脉瘤角度的统计学意义。
这些发现突出了MCA和ACOMM位置稳定动脉瘤的形态学和血流动力学差异。与ACOMM动脉瘤相比,稳定的MCA动脉瘤似乎能够承受更高的壁面应力值,导致ACOMM动脉瘤在MCA动脉瘤能够保持稳定的应力水平下更容易破裂。本研究强调了考虑形态学、血流动力学和结构力学因素以及稳定和破裂动脉瘤之间区别的重要性,以提高破裂风险评估的准确性。